Point‐of‐care ultrasound evaluation of a young male with flank pain
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 32-year-old male status post laparoscopic appendectomy 2 weeks prior presented to the emergency department with chief complaint of right-sided flank pain over the past 1 day. He denied any other associated symptoms. Vital signs were unremarkable. Physical examination revealed tenderness of the right flank and right lower abdominal quadrant. However, the abdomen was without rebound, guarding, or peritoneal signs. Renal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was performed at the bedside to evaluate for a possible obstructive urinary process; POCUS demonstrated moderate hydronephrosis of the right kidney (Figure 1A and 1B). Focused abdominal POCUS then was performed to evaluate for possible postoperative complications; POCUS demonstrated a large anechoic fluid collection within the right lower abdomen, most suggestive of an intraabdominal hematoma (Figure 1C and 1D). General surgery was immediately consulted due to the abnormal POCUS findings. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen/pelvis confirmed a 12.6 × 10.9 × 9.3 cm fluid collection located in the right lower abdomen consistent with a postoperative hematoma, with resultant compression of the right ureter causing moderate hydronephrosis of the right kidney (Figure 2). The patient was subsequently brought to the interventional radiology suite for CT-guided hematoma aspiration and surgical drain placement. Obstructive uropathy secondary to post-appendectomy complication of an intraabdominal hematoma. Appendectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures performed in the United States and worldwide.1, 2 Post-appendectomy complications include surgical site infections, intraabdominal abscesses, ileus, bowel obstructions, adhesions, postoperative bleeding/hematomas, and urinary tract infections.2-4 Rapid diagnosis of postoperative complications is a critical yet challenging task for the emergency physician. POCUS is an invaluable non-invasive imaging modality available to the emergency physician in the bedside evaluation of a multitude of abdominal emergencies.5 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case describing emergency physician-performed POCUS that identified a rare post-appendectomy complication of obstructive uropathy secondary to an intraabdominal hematoma. Most important, POCUS led to a timely diagnosis in this case, which prompted expeditious surgical consultation and further evaluation with gold-standard CT imaging. This report illustrates the promising role and clinical impact of POCUS as a first-line diagnostic choice in the initial ED assessment of patients with potential postoperative complications. The authors have nothing to disclose. This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».