Point‐of‐care ultrasound evaluation of a young male with flank pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 32-year-old male status post laparoscopic appendectomy 2 weeks prior presented to the emergency department with chief complaint of right-sided flank pain over the past 1 day. He denied any other associated symptoms. Vital signs were unremarkable. Physical examination revealed tenderness of the right flank and right lower abdominal quadrant. However, the abdomen was without rebound, guarding, or peritoneal signs. Renal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was performed at the bedside to evaluate for a possible obstructive urinary process; POCUS demonstrated moderate hydronephrosis of the right kidney (Figure 1A and 1B). Focused abdominal POCUS then was performed to evaluate for possible postoperative complications; POCUS demonstrated a large anechoic fluid collection within the right lower abdomen, most suggestive of an intraabdominal hematoma (Figure 1C and 1D). General surgery was immediately consulted due to the abnormal POCUS findings. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen/pelvis confirmed a 12.6 × 10.9 × 9.3 cm fluid collection located in the right lower abdomen consistent with a postoperative hematoma, with resultant compression of the right ureter causing moderate hydronephrosis of the right kidney (Figure 2). The patient was subsequently brought to the interventional radiology suite for CT-guided hematoma aspiration and surgical drain placement. Obstructive uropathy secondary to post-appendectomy complication of an intraabdominal hematoma. Appendectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures performed in the United States and worldwide. Post-appendectomy complications include surgical site infections, intraabdominal abscesses, ileus, bowel obstructions, adhesions, postoperative bleeding/hematomas, and urinary tract infections. Rapid diagnosis of postoperative complications is a critical yet challenging task for the emergency physician. POCUS is an invaluable non-invasive imaging modality available to the emergency physician in the bedside evaluation of a multitude of abdominal emergencies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case describing emergency physician-performed POCUS that identified a rare post-appendectomy complication of obstructive uropathy secondary to an intraabdominal hematoma. Most important, POCUS led to a timely diagnosis in this case, which prompted expeditious surgical consultation and further evaluation with gold-standard CT imaging. This report illustrates the promising role and clinical impact of POCUS as a first-line diagnostic choice in the initial ED assessment of patients with potential postoperative complications. The authors have nothing to disclose. This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".