Lower baroreflex sensitivity during muscle metaboreflex activation in children and adolescents with the Fontan circulation and single ventricle physiology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Individuals with the Fontan circulation and single ventricle physiology have elevated sympathetic nerve activity at rest and during muscle metaboreflex activation that is consistent with autonomic dysfunction. Adults with the Fontan circulation also show reduced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS); however, there is limited understanding of BRS in children or adolescents with the Fontan circulation. In healthy adults, BRS decreases with increased sympathetic nerve activity during isometric handgrip exercise, but not during isolated muscle metaboreflex activation. The effect of handgrip exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation on BRS in children and adolescents with the Fontan circulation is currently unknown. PURPOSE We tested the hypothesis that BRS is lower at rest and less responsive during handgrip exercise and post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation compared to healthy controls. METHODS Eight children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation (12 ± 2 yrs; 3 males) and 8 healthy controls (13 ± 4 yrs; 5 males) were studied. Continuous heart rate (ECG) and non‐invasive blood pressure (Finometer® MIDI) were recorded during 3‐min of resting baseline, 2‐min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, and 3‐min of PECO. Continuous heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure signals were analyzed using the BRS Analysis software (Nevrokard, Slovenia, 2018) to yield average BRS values during rest, handgrip, and PECO for each group. Differences between groups and across conditions were assessed using two‐way repeated measures (2 × 3, group × condition) ANOVA. P <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There was a significant group × condition interaction for BRS ( P <0.001). BRS was lower in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation vs. healthy controls at rest (13 ± 8 vs. 38 ± 10 ms/mmHg; P< 0.001) and during PECO (18 ± 17 vs. 37 ± 18 ms/mmHg; P =0.044), but not during handgrip (13 ± 10 vs. 14 ± 6 ms/mmHg; P =0.843). BRS in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation did not change across conditions ( P =0.188). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that BRS is lower at rest and has a blunted response during sympatho‐excitation in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation compared to healthy controls. Collectively, our findings indicate potential autonomic dysfunction in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».