MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lower baroreflex sensitivity during muscle metaboreflex activation in children and adolescents with the Fontan circulation and single ventricle physiology

2019· article· en· W3175264399 on OpenAlexaff
Natasha G. Boyes, Ramlah Iqbal, Stephanie Fusnik, Dana S. Lahti, Marta Erlandson, Kristi D. Wright, Ashok Kakadekar, Timothy J. Bradley, Scott Pharis, Charissa Pockett, T. Dylan Olver, Corey R. Tomczak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIsometric exerciseCardiologyVentricleBaroreflexHeart rateBlood pressureInternal medicineFontan procedureAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals with the Fontan circulation and single ventricle physiology have elevated sympathetic nerve activity at rest and during muscle metaboreflex activation that is consistent with autonomic dysfunction. Adults with the Fontan circulation also show reduced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS); however, there is limited understanding of BRS in children or adolescents with the Fontan circulation. In healthy adults, BRS decreases with increased sympathetic nerve activity during isometric handgrip exercise, but not during isolated muscle metaboreflex activation. The effect of handgrip exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation on BRS in children and adolescents with the Fontan circulation is currently unknown. PURPOSE We tested the hypothesis that BRS is lower at rest and less responsive during handgrip exercise and post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation compared to healthy controls. METHODS Eight children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation (12 ± 2 yrs; 3 males) and 8 healthy controls (13 ± 4 yrs; 5 males) were studied. Continuous heart rate (ECG) and non‐invasive blood pressure (Finometer® MIDI) were recorded during 3‐min of resting baseline, 2‐min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, and 3‐min of PECO. Continuous heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure signals were analyzed using the BRS Analysis software (Nevrokard, Slovenia, 2018) to yield average BRS values during rest, handgrip, and PECO for each group. Differences between groups and across conditions were assessed using two‐way repeated measures (2 × 3, group × condition) ANOVA. P <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There was a significant group × condition interaction for BRS ( P <0.001). BRS was lower in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation vs. healthy controls at rest (13 ± 8 vs. 38 ± 10 ms/mmHg; P< 0.001) and during PECO (18 ± 17 vs. 37 ± 18 ms/mmHg; P =0.044), but not during handgrip (13 ± 10 vs. 14 ± 6 ms/mmHg; P =0.843). BRS in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation did not change across conditions ( P =0.188). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that BRS is lower at rest and has a blunted response during sympatho‐excitation in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation compared to healthy controls. Collectively, our findings indicate potential autonomic dysfunction in children/adolescents with the Fontan circulation. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207