MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3181465279 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.06.038

Commentary: Five “Ws” of pulmonary arterioplasty for lung transplantation: Who, what, why, and where

2021· editorial· en· W3181465279 sur OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Yeung

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoToronto General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnastomosisLung transplantationMedicineTransplantationLungAngioplastyPulmonary arteryRight pulmonary arterySurgeryCardiologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageTechniques of pulmonary arterioplasty for size mismatch during lung transplantation can be important, but surgeons need to know when it is best to utilize them.See Article page 192. Techniques of pulmonary arterioplasty for size mismatch during lung transplantation can be important, but surgeons need to know when it is best to utilize them. See Article page 192. Pulmonary artery (PA) anastomosis during lung transplantation requires consideration of the length and diameter of the 2 vessels being anastomosed. Leaving the vessels long facilitates anastomosis, but risks postoperative kinking after the lung is inflated in a closed chest.1Chen F. Tazaki J. Shibata T. Miwa S. Yamazaki K. Ishii H. et al.Stent angioplasty for a kink in the pulmonary artery anastomosis soon after living-donor lobar lung transplantation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92: e105-e106Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar,2Banerjee S.K. Santhanakrishnan K. Shapiro L. Dunning J. Tsui S. Parmar J. Successful stenting of anastomotic stenosis of the left pulmonary artery after single lung transplantation.Eur Respir Rev. 2011; 20: 59-62Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Diameter discrepancy requires the careful circumferential narrowing of the larger vessel to match the smaller vessel, but inadvertent unequal suturing ratios may result in twisting, structuring, or narrowing of the anastomosis. This may result in turbulent flow, intraluminal thrombosis, or reduced flow to that lung, something of significance in single-lung transplantation.3Griffith B.P. Magee M.J. Gonzalez I.F. Houel R. Armitage J.M. Hardesty R.L. et al.Anastomotic pitfalls in lung transplantation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994; 107: 743-753Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar Yokoyama and colleagues4Yokoyama Y. Chen-Yoshikawa T.F. Nakajima D. Ohsumi A. Date H. Various techniques for anastomosis of pulmonary arteries with size mismatch during lung transplantation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 9: 192-194Scopus (4) Google Scholar describe 4 methods of pulmonary arterioplasty used at their center, a high-volume living donor lung transplant center where significant pulmonary arterial size mismatches are probably more likely to be encountered. Four major techniques are described, all of which aim to size-reduce the larger vessel before anastomosis such that a 1:1 suture distance ratio between donor and recipient can be achieved. All 4 methods can be generalized to the deceased donor lung transplant situation more familiar to most readers of the article, with the autopericardial patch technique being a maneuver likely to be employed only during inadvertent injury of the vessel. In the review of their experience, 19 patients out of 263 (7.2%) required arterioplasty, where tack suture was the technique most commonly used in the deceased donor population. No postoperative anastomotic complications were identified following these arterioplasties and suggest safety. The major missing piece of this article is the last “W”: When? Having read this article, surgeons encountering a major PA size mismatch may wish to employ 1 of these techniques. When is it necessary? When is this superior to conventional end-to-end size reduction? And, when should each of the 4 techniques be utilized? PA vessels are generally low-pressure and large and therefore more forgiving than smaller vascular anastomoses, so perhaps these are techniques borne from and necessary only in living donor lung transplantation. Indeed, with this group's unique experience in living donor lung transplantation, they have the unique potential to prospectively and comprehensively measure PA size mismatches and demonstrate when arterioplasty might be superior to circumferential correction. Regardless, these techniques and their outcomes should be known to lung transplant surgeons even if not routinely employed. The “when” may yet become obvious at 3 am during a difficult lung implantation. I look forward to learning more from the authors in the future about when these techniques are best employed. Various techniques for anastomosis of pulmonary arteries with size mismatch during lung transplantationJTCVS TechniquesVol. 9PreviewVessels of different calibers are often encountered when anastomosing pulmonary arteries (PAs) during lung transplantation. In living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), grafts are taken from the donor's lower lobes, and pulmonary anastomosis sometimes requires adjustment of the caliber of the blood vessels due to mismatch between the donor's and the recipient's PAs. Among the solutions to this problem, as we previously reported, is donor graft PA plasty using an autopericardial patch to preserve the donor's lingular branch if the graft's PA has a diagonal cut line. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,249
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207