MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W318577417

Afro-Anglican Retrospective: Toronto, Cape Town, Barbados

2007· article· en· W318577417 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orris G. Walker

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnglican Theological Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueChristian Theology and Mission
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBishopsWonderHistorySociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

People of African descent are often surprised by the similarity of their experiences. The three international conferences and the two pre-Lambeth meetings of Afro-Anglican bishops reinforced the reality that we had much in common, so much so that it was easy to build community. For several years now. members of the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church, now styled as the Community of Bishops, have gathered twice a year in table groupings in search of the elusive experience of community. I often wonder if our search will prove successful. In 1988 as a new bishop, I attended the pre-Lambeth meeting that followed the First Afro-Anglican Conference held in Barbados. That gathering in Cambridge introduced me to the concept of community on the world stage, and subsequently the world was introduced to the emerging concept of Afro-Anglicanism. At our pre-Lambeth meeting, not only were we schooled on the agenda and protocols, we also were advised that we were expected to be seen and not heard. Onrpre-meeting helped to change all of that, and to all assembled it became evident that we were able to have an impact on the agenda of the Lambeth Conference. Shortly after that Lambeth Conference, I was approached to assume the chair to plan for the next decade. My growing belief in the concept of Afro-Anglicanism led me to accept the responsibility for the Second International Conference. After all, it was almost ten years away. By not being involved in or attending the first conference, I had no idea of the level of commitment for me or for the Diocese of Long Island, but plan we did for the 1995 Cape Town conference and the subsequent second pre-Lambeth meeting of bishops. The Cape Town meeting was a once-in-a-lifetime experience. At the very time the American Church was embroiled in a discussion regarding racism and the proper response to that insidious evil, we were having tea at Bishopscourt, tours of Robbcn Island, celebrations at the City Hall, and worship at St. George's-the People's Cathedral. While others have written about the theological significance of the Cape Town meeting, let me state that our experiences in the emerging Rainbow Nation of South Africa shifted attention away from the broader anti burgeoning problematic issues of the Anglican Communion to a more narrow focus on communion as a place where the gifts of all were becoming more freely accepted. In hindsight, I now believe that the danger signals looming over the Anglican Communions horizon during that decade were just too dressed over by the gossamer euphoria of holding a meeting in Cape Town, where Archbishop Desmond Tutu would welcome all who could afford passage to a Free South Africa. The strains in the fabric of our community could not compete for attention as we celebrated with our brothers and sisters in the Church of the Province of Southern Africa. In my more reflective moments, I should have been more attuned to the signals. Our joy should have been tempered by the reality that the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. George Carey, did not take us as seriously as had his predecessor, Dr. Robert Runcie. And we did not notice that our growing concept of a community with shared leadership left little room for shooting stars. In 1998, at the pre-Lambeth meeting of Afro-Anglican bishops, the veneer of our community remained intact while the strains were becoming apparent. The shooting-star effect was becoming quite apparent. Nevertheless, we began planning for the Third International Conference on Afro-Anglicanism shortly upon our return from the University of Kent, the venue of the Lambeth Conference. Once again, and with a better knowledge of the minefields that lay ahead, I committed my diocese and myself. Planning began in earnest shortly before the 2003 General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the USA. Learning from past experiences, we assembled a more international planning team, we moved the venue to Toronto, Canada, we selected a theme, and we began building upon the success of the two previous gatherings. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,928
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,896

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnglican Theological ReviewMême sujetChristian Theology and MissionTravaux en français237 207