MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W318577417

Afro-Anglican Retrospective: Toronto, Cape Town, Barbados

2007· article· en· W318577417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orris G. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican Theological Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicChristian Theology and Mission
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBishopsWonderHistorySociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People of African descent are often surprised by the similarity of their experiences. The three international conferences and the two pre-Lambeth meetings of Afro-Anglican bishops reinforced the reality that we had much in common, so much so that it was easy to build community. For several years now. members of the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church, now styled as the Community of Bishops, have gathered twice a year in table groupings in search of the elusive experience of community. I often wonder if our search will prove successful. In 1988 as a new bishop, I attended the pre-Lambeth meeting that followed the First Afro-Anglican Conference held in Barbados. That gathering in Cambridge introduced me to the concept of community on the world stage, and subsequently the world was introduced to the emerging concept of Afro-Anglicanism. At our pre-Lambeth meeting, not only were we schooled on the agenda and protocols, we also were advised that we were expected to be seen and not heard. Onrpre-meeting helped to change all of that, and to all assembled it became evident that we were able to have an impact on the agenda of the Lambeth Conference. Shortly after that Lambeth Conference, I was approached to assume the chair to plan for the next decade. My growing belief in the concept of Afro-Anglicanism led me to accept the responsibility for the Second International Conference. After all, it was almost ten years away. By not being involved in or attending the first conference, I had no idea of the level of commitment for me or for the Diocese of Long Island, but plan we did for the 1995 Cape Town conference and the subsequent second pre-Lambeth meeting of bishops. The Cape Town meeting was a once-in-a-lifetime experience. At the very time the American Church was embroiled in a discussion regarding racism and the proper response to that insidious evil, we were having tea at Bishopscourt, tours of Robbcn Island, celebrations at the City Hall, and worship at St. George's-the People's Cathedral. While others have written about the theological significance of the Cape Town meeting, let me state that our experiences in the emerging Rainbow Nation of South Africa shifted attention away from the broader anti burgeoning problematic issues of the Anglican Communion to a more narrow focus on communion as a place where the gifts of all were becoming more freely accepted. In hindsight, I now believe that the danger signals looming over the Anglican Communions horizon during that decade were just too dressed over by the gossamer euphoria of holding a meeting in Cape Town, where Archbishop Desmond Tutu would welcome all who could afford passage to a Free South Africa. The strains in the fabric of our community could not compete for attention as we celebrated with our brothers and sisters in the Church of the Province of Southern Africa. In my more reflective moments, I should have been more attuned to the signals. Our joy should have been tempered by the reality that the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. George Carey, did not take us as seriously as had his predecessor, Dr. Robert Runcie. And we did not notice that our growing concept of a community with shared leadership left little room for shooting stars. In 1998, at the pre-Lambeth meeting of Afro-Anglican bishops, the veneer of our community remained intact while the strains were becoming apparent. The shooting-star effect was becoming quite apparent. Nevertheless, we began planning for the Third International Conference on Afro-Anglicanism shortly upon our return from the University of Kent, the venue of the Lambeth Conference. Once again, and with a better knowledge of the minefields that lay ahead, I committed my diocese and myself. Planning began in earnest shortly before the 2003 General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the USA. Learning from past experiences, we assembled a more international planning team, we moved the venue to Toronto, Canada, we selected a theme, and we began building upon the success of the two previous gatherings. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnglican Theological ReviewSame topicChristian Theology and MissionFrench-language works237,207