P–208 Oleic acid rescues altered autophagy induced by palmitic acid during mouse preimplantation development
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question The aim of the study is to identify the autophagic profile and the effects of fatty acid treatments on autophagic activity in preimplantation mouse embryos. Summary answer Autophagic activity varies significantly in early stages of mouse preimplantation development; exposure to fatty acids alters the embryonic autophagy profile. What is known already Obesity is one of the top comorbidities for infertility, and obese individuals have elevated fatty acid levels. In serum, palmitic acid (PA) and oleic acid (OA) are the most abundant saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, respectively. We recently reported that PA impairs blastocyst development, affects mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, triacylglycerol levels, and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways during mouse preimplantation development. Interestingly, the addition of OA counteracts those effects. Autophagy plays an essential role in embryo development, as knock-out of a key autophagy protein is embryonic lethal. Little is known about the autophagic profile in fatty acid treated mouse preimplantation embryos. Study design, size, duration Pools of 20 – 25 mouse embryos were collected from gonadotrophin super-ovulated and mated CD1 female mice. Two-cell stage embryos were treated with 100 µM PA and 250 µM OA, alone and in combination, and 1.5% bovine serum albumin media (control) within KSOMaa media for 18, 24, and 48 hours in vitro. The detection of various autophagic markers were evaluated by immunofluorescence microscopy and RT-qPCR. Participants/materials, setting, methods mRNA levels of autophagic markers were measured using RT-qPCR with the Taqman primers and Universal PCR Mix. Immunofluorescence staining of LC3 puncta (marker for autophagosome formation) was performed using LC3A/B polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen PA1–16931) and DAPI (4′,6-Diamidino–2-phenylindole dihydrochloride) was used to stain for cell nuclei. Analysis of LC3 puncta was performed using ImageJ software. Images were acquired using an LSM 800 laser scanning confocal microscope. Data analysis was completed by GraphPad Prism software. Main results and the role of chance Mouse preimplantation embryos showed no change in mRNA levels of autophagic markers (Bcln1, ATG3, ATG5, and LC3) relative to the control group after 48-hours exposure of 100 µM PA and 250 µM OA treatments, alone and in combination. The number of LC3 puncta was measured and analyzed as a reflection of autophagic activity in mouse preimplantation embryos. Under the fatty acid-free condition, the average number of LC3 puncta per blastomere was significantly decreased after 18 hours of development (p < 0.005). However, the average number of LC3 puncta per blastomere at 18, 24, and 48 hours were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.2724). Following 100 µM PA and 250 µM OA treatments, alone and in combination, autophagic activity was impacted by the presence of fatty acids. Mouse preimplantation embryos exposed to control and fatty acid treatment groups demonstrated no significant differences in LC3 puncta per blastomere at 18- and 24-hours treatment time (p = 0.5381; p = 0.7829). However, embryos exposed to 48 hours of PA treatment had a significantly greater number of LC3 puncta per blastomere than embryos exposed to 48 hours of OA and PA and OA combination treatments (p < 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution Although LC3 puncta count (autophagosome formation) is impacted by fatty acid treatment, autophagic flux must be measured to fully investigate autophagic activity during mouse preimplantation development. These processes need to be measured in human embryos cultured in vitro. Wider implications of the findings: Profiling autophagic activity in fatty acid treated mouse preimplantation embryos would guide future investigations on pharmacological modulation of autophagy as a therapeutic intervention for developmentally delayed embryos. With the information gained, we aim to develop strategies to assist overweight and obese patients with their fertility needs. Trial registration number Not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».