MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3193753057 · doi:10.31154/ktr.v1i2.549.86-103

ELLEN G. WHITE PERSPECTIVE ON POLITICS AMONG SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST LEADERS

2021· article· en· W3193753057 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edwin Melky Lumingkewas

Notice bibliographique

RevueKlabat Theological Review · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Society, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsMindsetWhite (mutation)SociologyPower (physics)NegotiationLawReligious studiesPolitical scienceGender studiesManagementPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Politics is taking place into pastoral leadership. This practice has its chance to be practiced because of cultural background. However, it brings contention among pastors and affect the mission of the church. Ellen G. White as one of the founder of SDA church paid attention to the practice of politics in the church. For SDA church members politics is restricted because it brings evil effects unto physical, mental and spiritual life. They need to avoid politics in order to develop true God’s character. It can also create division among church members. And the most important is if Christians cling into it, God would not acknowledge them as His people. For pastors and teachers, their role is to form the mindset of church members. This role prohibits them to politics.  They will not bring unity in the church when they involve politics in their discourses. Even in more firm statement Ellen White ask them to be disqualified from work which paid by tithe. While He was on the earth, Jesus never practice politics. So every Christian need to be away from politics.   Keywords: Politics   References Allen, Robert W, Dan L. Madison, Lyman W. Porter, Patricia A. Renwick, and Bronston T. Mayes, “Organizational Politics: Tactics and Characteristics of Its Actors. California Management Review 22, 1979. Cervero, Ronald M. and Arthur L. Wilson, Planning Responsibly in Adult Education: A Guide to Negotiating Power and Interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994. Champoux, Joseph E. Champoux, Organizational Behavior: Essential Tenets for A New Millenium. Canada: Southwestern College, 2000. Champoux, Joseph E.  Organizational Behavior: Essential Tenets for A New Millenium. Canada: Southwestern College, 2000. Coopey, John and John Bourgoyne. “Politics and Organizational Learning.” Journal of Management Studies 37(6), (2000): 869-885. Forrester, Duncan B, Theology and Politics. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988 French, Wendell and Cecil H. Bell, Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999. Gangel, Kenneth O, The Meaning of Leadership. In J. D. Berkley, Leadership handbook of management and administration (pp. 177-183). Manila, Philippines: CLC, 2007. Hitt, Michael A, Chet C. Miller, and Adrienne Colella, Organizational Behavior: A Strategic Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Kanter M. Rosabeth, Barry A. Stein, and Todd Jick, The Challenge of Organizational Change:How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. New York: The Free, 1992 Kotter, John P, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free Press, 1990. Maleke, Ray “A Minahasa Local Theology,” (September 2013): http://raymaleke.blogspot.com/2013/09/chapter-six_2634.html, accessed 13 May, 2014. Mamahit, http://mamahit.com/ukung.html, (1994).  Accessed May 11, 2014 Marcos, “Keindahan Demokratisasi dan Toleransi Di Minahasa,” http://www.marcos.my.id/view/keindahan-demokratisasi-dan-toleransi-di-minahasa.html, (2013) accessed May 11, 2014 McCroskey, James, Virginia P. Richmond, Timothy Plax and Patricia Kearney, “Power in the Classroom: Behavior Alteration Techniques, Communication Training and Learning. Communication Education 34 (1995). McShane, Steven L and  Mary Ann Von Glinow, Organizational Behavior 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. Mintzberg, Henry, Mel Didier, and Gerry Arbic, Power in and Around Organizations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983. Morgan, Gareth. Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2006. Paulin, Jon, “Politics in the church,” Ministry, August 2011, pp. 15-17. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, Managing with power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1993. Plax, Timothy, Patricia Kearney, and Timothy M. Downs, “Communicating Control in the Classroom and Satisfaction with Teaching and Students” Communication Education 35, 1986. Rahim, Afzalur M, “Relationship of Leader Power to Compliance and Satisfaction with Supervision: Evidence from A National Sample of Managers” Journal of Management 15, 1989. Roderick, “The Minahasa: Si Tou Timou Tumou Tou,” (2007), http://www.theminahasa.net/indexen.html.  accessed May 13, 2014 Senge, Peter M, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 2006. Siwi, Ramly “Masyarakat Minahasa Kuno, (2008), https://publikreport.com/ masyarakat-minahasa-kuno/, accessed 8 May 2021 Stott, John, Calling Christian Leaders: Biblical Model of Church, Gospel and Ministry. England: InterVarsity, 2002. Testimonies for the Church 7:252. SPCCSR 113.1 https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/721.640#644 Wheatley, Margaret J, Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in A Chaotic World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1992. White, Ellen G. (1855a; 2002), Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press. White, Ellen G. Christian Service. Washington, DC: Review and Herald, 1925; 2002. White, Ellen G. Daniel an Example of Faithfulness, The Signs of the Times. Vol. 12.  Oakland, CA: International Tract and Missionary Society, 1886; 2002. White, Ellen G. Fundamentals of Christian Education, Instruction for the Home, the School, and the Church; Fundamentals of Christian Education, Southern Publishing Association, 1923; 2002. White, Ellen G. Pastoral Ministry. Silver Spring, MD: General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Ministerial Association, 1995. White, Ellen G. Testimonies for the Church, Vol.5. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1855b; 2002 White, Ellen G. Testimonies for the Church, Vol.9. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1855c; 2002. White, Ellen G. Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1923; 2002. White, Ellen G., Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1923; 2002). White, Ellen G., The Story of Prophets and Kings. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1943). Yukl, Gary, Helen Kim, and Cecilia M. Falbe, “Antecedents Of Influence Outcomes” Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 1996.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,007
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKlabat Theological ReviewMême sujetReligion, Society, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207