MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193753057 · doi:10.31154/ktr.v1i2.549.86-103

ELLEN G. WHITE PERSPECTIVE ON POLITICS AMONG SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST LEADERS

2021· article· en· W3193753057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edwin Melky Lumingkewas

Bibliographic record

VenueKlabat Theological Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsMindsetWhite (mutation)SociologyPower (physics)NegotiationLawReligious studiesPolitical scienceGender studiesManagementPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Politics is taking place into pastoral leadership. This practice has its chance to be practiced because of cultural background. However, it brings contention among pastors and affect the mission of the church. Ellen G. White as one of the founder of SDA church paid attention to the practice of politics in the church. For SDA church members politics is restricted because it brings evil effects unto physical, mental and spiritual life. They need to avoid politics in order to develop true God’s character. It can also create division among church members. And the most important is if Christians cling into it, God would not acknowledge them as His people. For pastors and teachers, their role is to form the mindset of church members. This role prohibits them to politics.  They will not bring unity in the church when they involve politics in their discourses. Even in more firm statement Ellen White ask them to be disqualified from work which paid by tithe. While He was on the earth, Jesus never practice politics. So every Christian need to be away from politics.   Keywords: Politics   References Allen, Robert W, Dan L. Madison, Lyman W. Porter, Patricia A. Renwick, and Bronston T. Mayes, “Organizational Politics: Tactics and Characteristics of Its Actors. California Management Review 22, 1979. Cervero, Ronald M. and Arthur L. Wilson, Planning Responsibly in Adult Education: A Guide to Negotiating Power and Interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994. Champoux, Joseph E. Champoux, Organizational Behavior: Essential Tenets for A New Millenium. Canada: Southwestern College, 2000. Champoux, Joseph E.  Organizational Behavior: Essential Tenets for A New Millenium. Canada: Southwestern College, 2000. Coopey, John and John Bourgoyne. “Politics and Organizational Learning.” Journal of Management Studies 37(6), (2000): 869-885. Forrester, Duncan B, Theology and Politics. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988 French, Wendell and Cecil H. Bell, Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999. Gangel, Kenneth O, The Meaning of Leadership. In J. D. Berkley, Leadership handbook of management and administration (pp. 177-183). Manila, Philippines: CLC, 2007. Hitt, Michael A, Chet C. Miller, and Adrienne Colella, Organizational Behavior: A Strategic Approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Kanter M. Rosabeth, Barry A. Stein, and Todd Jick, The Challenge of Organizational Change:How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. New York: The Free, 1992 Kotter, John P, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free Press, 1990. Maleke, Ray “A Minahasa Local Theology,” (September 2013): http://raymaleke.blogspot.com/2013/09/chapter-six_2634.html, accessed 13 May, 2014. Mamahit, http://mamahit.com/ukung.html, (1994).  Accessed May 11, 2014 Marcos, “Keindahan Demokratisasi dan Toleransi Di Minahasa,” http://www.marcos.my.id/view/keindahan-demokratisasi-dan-toleransi-di-minahasa.html, (2013) accessed May 11, 2014 McCroskey, James, Virginia P. Richmond, Timothy Plax and Patricia Kearney, “Power in the Classroom: Behavior Alteration Techniques, Communication Training and Learning. Communication Education 34 (1995). McShane, Steven L and  Mary Ann Von Glinow, Organizational Behavior 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. Mintzberg, Henry, Mel Didier, and Gerry Arbic, Power in and Around Organizations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983. Morgan, Gareth. Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2006. Paulin, Jon, “Politics in the church,” Ministry, August 2011, pp. 15-17. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, Managing with power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1993. Plax, Timothy, Patricia Kearney, and Timothy M. Downs, “Communicating Control in the Classroom and Satisfaction with Teaching and Students” Communication Education 35, 1986. Rahim, Afzalur M, “Relationship of Leader Power to Compliance and Satisfaction with Supervision: Evidence from A National Sample of Managers” Journal of Management 15, 1989. Roderick, “The Minahasa: Si Tou Timou Tumou Tou,” (2007), http://www.theminahasa.net/indexen.html.  accessed May 13, 2014 Senge, Peter M, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 2006. Siwi, Ramly “Masyarakat Minahasa Kuno, (2008), https://publikreport.com/ masyarakat-minahasa-kuno/, accessed 8 May 2021 Stott, John, Calling Christian Leaders: Biblical Model of Church, Gospel and Ministry. England: InterVarsity, 2002. Testimonies for the Church 7:252. SPCCSR 113.1 https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/721.640#644 Wheatley, Margaret J, Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in A Chaotic World. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1992. White, Ellen G. (1855a; 2002), Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press. White, Ellen G. Christian Service. Washington, DC: Review and Herald, 1925; 2002. White, Ellen G. Daniel an Example of Faithfulness, The Signs of the Times. Vol. 12.  Oakland, CA: International Tract and Missionary Society, 1886; 2002. White, Ellen G. Fundamentals of Christian Education, Instruction for the Home, the School, and the Church; Fundamentals of Christian Education, Southern Publishing Association, 1923; 2002. White, Ellen G. Pastoral Ministry. Silver Spring, MD: General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, Ministerial Association, 1995. White, Ellen G. Testimonies for the Church, Vol.5. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1855b; 2002 White, Ellen G. Testimonies for the Church, Vol.9. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1855c; 2002. White, Ellen G. Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers. Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1923; 2002. White, Ellen G., Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1923; 2002). White, Ellen G., The Story of Prophets and Kings. (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1943). Yukl, Gary, Helen Kim, and Cecilia M. Falbe, “Antecedents Of Influence Outcomes” Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 1996.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKlabat Theological ReviewSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207