MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3194125143 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.08.005

Transient Acquired QT Interval Prolongation After Administration of Intravenous Ondansetron

2021· article· en· W3194125143 sur OpenAlexaff
Ruochen Mao, Evan J. Wiens, Basem Elbarouni

Notice bibliographique

RevueCJC Open · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQT intervalMedicineAnesthesiaCardiologyInternal medicineOndansetronHeart rateQRS complexBundle branch blockElectrocardiographySinus rhythmLong QT syndromeNauseaAtrial fibrillationBlood pressure

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 62-year-old man with a history of stable ischemic heart disease presented to the emergency room with nausea, vomiting, and chest pain at rest. The chest pain was atypical in nature; it did not respond to nitroglycerin and did not worsen with exertion. He took only aspirin, metoprolol, and ramipril at home. The patient was normotensive and normoxemic. Serial high-sensitivity troponin test results were normal, and other bloodwork (including calcium and magnesium levels) was unremarkable, with the exception of a serum potassium level of 2.4 mmol/L. His presenting electrocardiogram (ECG; Fig. 1A ) showed sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block and a mildly prolonged QTc interval (450 msec using Bazett’s formula1Bazett H. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms.Heart. 1920; 7: 353-370Google Scholar). However, conduction delays prolong the QRS interval, which affects the length of the QT interval without significant impact on the repolarization duration. Bogossian’s formula can correct the QTc interval in the presence of bundle branch blocks, and this yielded a normal QTc interval of 302 msec.2Bogossian H. Linz D. Heijman J. et al.QTc evaluation in patients with bundle branch block.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020; 30: 100636PubMed Google ScholarFigure 1Electrocardiogram showing (A) sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block (bbb) and mildly prolonged QTc interval; (B) ST changes with profound QTc interval prolongation; and (C) partial resolution of the ST changes.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) During his time in the emergency room, he experienced nausea and was given 4 mg of ondansetron intravenously. He was also given 40 mmol of KCl orally for his hypokalemia. Fifteen minutes later, the patient had a mild recurrence of atypical chest discomfort at rest, and another ECG Fig. 1B) was performed. This showed nonspecific ST changes with profound QTc interval prolongation, using both Bogossian’s formula (562 msec) and Bazett’s formula (628 msec). In addition to QTc interval prolongation, there was a dramatic difference in T wave morphology, including prolongation of the Tpeak–Tend interval. Ten minutes later, an ECG (Fig. 1C) and blood work were repeated, which showed a serum potassium level of 3 mmol/L, and partial resolution of the ST changes. The patient was not given any further QT-prolonging medication, and he was subsequently diagnosed with noncardiac chest pain after undergoing normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Severe hypokalemia is a known cause of QT interval prolongation.3Yelamanchi V.P. Molnar J. Ranade V. Somberg J.C. Influence of electrolyte abnormalities on interlead variability of ventricular repolarization times in 12-lead electrocardiography.Am J Ther. 2001; 8: 117-122Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar However, this patient’s initial ECG demonstrates a normal (by Bogossian’s formula) or only modestly prolonged (by Bazett’s formula) QTc interval. Subsequent administration of IV ondansetron resulted in profound transient QTc interval prolongation relative to this patient’s baseline, and marked changes in T wave morphology. It has been previously described that intravenous ondansetron administration can lead to QT interval prolongation and T wave changes. Our patient had a history of ischemic heart disease; the presence of structural heart disease increases the risk for acquired QT interval prolongation. Such prolongations of the QTc and Tpeak–Tend intervals are associated with increased risk of Torsades de Pointes and sudden cardiac death, with the risk increasing proportionally to QTc interval duration.4Thomas S. Behr E. Pharmacologic treatment of acquired QT prolongation and torsades de pointe.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 81: 420-427Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 5Hafermann M. Namdar R. Seibold G. et al.Effect of intravenous ondansetron on QT interval prolongation in patients with cardiovascular disease and additional risk factors for torsades: a prospective, observational study.Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011; 3: 53-58PubMed Google Scholar, 6Tse G. Gong M. Meng L. et al.Predictive value of Tpeak-Tend indices for adverse outcomes on acquired QT prolongation: a meta-analysis.Front Physiol. 2018; 9: 1226Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar These images demonstrate the importance of cautious administration of QT interval–prolonging medications, particularly in the presence of other risk factors for QT interval prolongation such as hypokalemia and underlying structural heart disease, even if the baseline QTc interval is not markedly prolonged.Novel Teaching Points•Proper assessment of the QT interval is important in the setting of a bundle branch block, as widening of the QRS will cause subsequent QT interval prolongation without significant impact on the duration of repolarization.•Bogossian’s formula is an alternative method for calculating the QT interval in the setting of a bundle branch block. However, no single formula is perfect for QTc interval calculation in every situation.•Caution is needed when prescribing medications that prolong the QT interval, especially for patients with an underlying predilection for QT interval prolongation. The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,247
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,329

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCJC OpenMême sujetCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasTravaux en français237 207