MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194125143 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.08.005

Transient Acquired QT Interval Prolongation After Administration of Intravenous Ondansetron

2021· article· en· W3194125143 on OpenAlexaff
Ruochen Mao, Evan J. Wiens, Basem Elbarouni

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQT intervalMedicineAnesthesiaCardiologyInternal medicineOndansetronHeart rateQRS complexBundle branch blockElectrocardiographySinus rhythmLong QT syndromeNauseaAtrial fibrillationBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 62-year-old man with a history of stable ischemic heart disease presented to the emergency room with nausea, vomiting, and chest pain at rest. The chest pain was atypical in nature; it did not respond to nitroglycerin and did not worsen with exertion. He took only aspirin, metoprolol, and ramipril at home. The patient was normotensive and normoxemic. Serial high-sensitivity troponin test results were normal, and other bloodwork (including calcium and magnesium levels) was unremarkable, with the exception of a serum potassium level of 2.4 mmol/L. His presenting electrocardiogram (ECG; Fig. 1A ) showed sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block and a mildly prolonged QTc interval (450 msec using Bazett’s formula1Bazett H. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms.Heart. 1920; 7: 353-370Google Scholar). However, conduction delays prolong the QRS interval, which affects the length of the QT interval without significant impact on the repolarization duration. Bogossian’s formula can correct the QTc interval in the presence of bundle branch blocks, and this yielded a normal QTc interval of 302 msec.2Bogossian H. Linz D. Heijman J. et al.QTc evaluation in patients with bundle branch block.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020; 30: 100636PubMed Google ScholarFigure 1Electrocardiogram showing (A) sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block (bbb) and mildly prolonged QTc interval; (B) ST changes with profound QTc interval prolongation; and (C) partial resolution of the ST changes.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) During his time in the emergency room, he experienced nausea and was given 4 mg of ondansetron intravenously. He was also given 40 mmol of KCl orally for his hypokalemia. Fifteen minutes later, the patient had a mild recurrence of atypical chest discomfort at rest, and another ECG Fig. 1B) was performed. This showed nonspecific ST changes with profound QTc interval prolongation, using both Bogossian’s formula (562 msec) and Bazett’s formula (628 msec). In addition to QTc interval prolongation, there was a dramatic difference in T wave morphology, including prolongation of the Tpeak–Tend interval. Ten minutes later, an ECG (Fig. 1C) and blood work were repeated, which showed a serum potassium level of 3 mmol/L, and partial resolution of the ST changes. The patient was not given any further QT-prolonging medication, and he was subsequently diagnosed with noncardiac chest pain after undergoing normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Severe hypokalemia is a known cause of QT interval prolongation.3Yelamanchi V.P. Molnar J. Ranade V. Somberg J.C. Influence of electrolyte abnormalities on interlead variability of ventricular repolarization times in 12-lead electrocardiography.Am J Ther. 2001; 8: 117-122Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar However, this patient’s initial ECG demonstrates a normal (by Bogossian’s formula) or only modestly prolonged (by Bazett’s formula) QTc interval. Subsequent administration of IV ondansetron resulted in profound transient QTc interval prolongation relative to this patient’s baseline, and marked changes in T wave morphology. It has been previously described that intravenous ondansetron administration can lead to QT interval prolongation and T wave changes. Our patient had a history of ischemic heart disease; the presence of structural heart disease increases the risk for acquired QT interval prolongation. Such prolongations of the QTc and Tpeak–Tend intervals are associated with increased risk of Torsades de Pointes and sudden cardiac death, with the risk increasing proportionally to QTc interval duration.4Thomas S. Behr E. Pharmacologic treatment of acquired QT prolongation and torsades de pointe.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 81: 420-427Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 5Hafermann M. Namdar R. Seibold G. et al.Effect of intravenous ondansetron on QT interval prolongation in patients with cardiovascular disease and additional risk factors for torsades: a prospective, observational study.Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011; 3: 53-58PubMed Google Scholar, 6Tse G. Gong M. Meng L. et al.Predictive value of Tpeak-Tend indices for adverse outcomes on acquired QT prolongation: a meta-analysis.Front Physiol. 2018; 9: 1226Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar These images demonstrate the importance of cautious administration of QT interval–prolonging medications, particularly in the presence of other risk factors for QT interval prolongation such as hypokalemia and underlying structural heart disease, even if the baseline QTc interval is not markedly prolonged.Novel Teaching Points•Proper assessment of the QT interval is important in the setting of a bundle branch block, as widening of the QRS will cause subsequent QT interval prolongation without significant impact on the duration of repolarization.•Bogossian’s formula is an alternative method for calculating the QT interval in the setting of a bundle branch block. However, no single formula is perfect for QTc interval calculation in every situation.•Caution is needed when prescribing medications that prolong the QT interval, especially for patients with an underlying predilection for QT interval prolongation. The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207