MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3195780782 · doi:10.1111/gcb.15841

The success of the Montreal Protocol in mitigating interactive effects of stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change on the environment

2021· letter· en· W3195780782 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul W. Barnes, Janet F. Bornman, Krishna K. Pandey, G. Bernhard, Alkiviadis Bais, Rachel Ε. Neale, T. Matthew Robson, Patrick J. Neale, Craig E. Williamson, Richard G. Zepp, S. Madronich, Stephen R. Wilson, Anthony L. Andrady, Anu Heikkilä, Sharon A. Robinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueGlobal Change Biology · 2021
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMontreal ProtocolOzone layerOzone depletionClimate changeEnvironmental scienceGlobal warmingGreenhouse gasGlobal changeKyoto ProtocolOzoneEcologyMeteorologyGeographyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments have been highly effective in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer, preventing global increases in solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B; 280–315 nm) at Earth's surface, and reducing global warming. While ongoing and projected changes in UV-B radiation and climate still pose a threat to human health, food security, air and water quality, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and construction materials and fabrics, the Montreal Protocol continues to play a critical role in protecting Earth's inhabitants and ecosystems by addressing many of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments have been highly effective in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer and preventing global increases in solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B; 280–315 nm) at Earth's surface (McKenzie et al., 2019). This international agreement has also been one of the most important societal actions to mitigate global warming, as many of the ozone-depleting substances and their substitutes that are regulated by the Montreal Protocol are also potent greenhouse gases (Velders et al., 2007). Ozone depletion itself contributes to climate change in some regions (Robinson & Erickson III, 2015), and climate change modifies the exposure of humans, plants, animals, and materials to UV-B as well as UV-A radiation (315–400 nm; Barnes et al., 2019). Thus, changes in stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate are inextricably linked in a number of critical ways that influence human health and the environment (Figure 1). The Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) of the United Nations Environment Programme regularly assesses the interactive effects of changes in stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate on the environment. Findings from our updates (Neale et al., 2021) and full assessments (EEAP 2018 Assessment; https://pubs.rsc.org/ja/journals/articlecollectionlanding?sercode=pp&themeid=034015c8-12de-4196-9526-18090345cf96) indicate that, because of the Montreal Protocol, changes in surface UV-B radiation over the past 20 years have been relatively small (ca. <±4% per decade). For most regions over this period, changes in cloud cover and aerosols have had a larger effect than changes in stratospheric ozone on variation in UV radiation. Climate change is exerting an increasing effect on exposure to UV radiation as a consequence of changes in phenology, cloud cover, aerosols, snow and ice cover, species distributions, water quality, and extreme weather events. Moreover, stratospheric ozone depletion over Antarctica is strongly linked to the climate of the Southern Hemisphere (e.g., Damiani et al., 2020). It is estimated that by 2050 the Montreal Protocol will have prevented global warming over land of 1.5–4°C, depending on the region (Goyal et al., 2019). While their magnitude has been limited by the Montreal Protocol, ongoing and projected changes in UV radiation and climate still pose a threat to food security, air and water quality, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and construction materials and fabrics. Exposure to solar UV radiation increases the decomposition of organic matter in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, which releases carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere—an important feedback effect on the climate system. Modeling studies estimate that the Montreal Protocol will prevent millions of cases of skin cancers and cataracts in the United States alone. However, exposure to solar UV radiation also has benefits for health. Most notably, it generates vitamin D (which is critical for bone and muscle health), disinfects surface waters of pathogens, and also plays an important role in immune function, an effect that is important in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Balancing the positive and negative effects of UV exposure on human health would have been difficult to achieve in a world without the Montreal Protocol. In today's rapidly changing world, the Montreal Protocol continues to play a critical role in protecting Earth's inhabitants and ecosystems by addressing many of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Figure 1; Neale et al., 2021). We wish to acknowledge the following EEAP members and co-authors who have contributed to our assessments on which this Letter is based: P.J. Aucamp, A.T. Banaszak, L.S. Bruckman, S.N. Byrne, B. Føreid, D.-P. Häder, L.M. Hollestein, W.-C. Hou, S. Hylander, M.A.K. Jansen, A.R. Klekociuk, J.B. Liley, J. Longstreth, R.M. Lucas, J. Martinez-Abaigar, K. McNeill, C.M. Olsen, L.E. Rhodes, K.C. Rose, T. Schikowski, K.R. Solomon, B. Sulzberger, J.E. Ukpebor, Q.-W. Wang, S.-Å. Wängberg, C.C. White, S. Yazar, A.R. Young, P.J. Young, L. Zhu, and M. Zhu. The authors declare no competing financial or other interests. Data sharing not applicable—no new data generated.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,090
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations26
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGlobal Change BiologyMême sujetAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateTravaux en français237 207