MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195780782 · doi:10.1111/gcb.15841

The success of the Montreal Protocol in mitigating interactive effects of stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change on the environment

2021· letter· en· W3195780782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul W. Barnes, Janet F. Bornman, Krishna K. Pandey, G. Bernhard, Alkiviadis Bais, Rachel Ε. Neale, T. Matthew Robson, Patrick J. Neale, Craig E. Williamson, Richard G. Zepp, S. Madronich, Stephen R. Wilson, Anthony L. Andrady, Anu Heikkilä, Sharon A. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Change Biology · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolOzone layerOzone depletionClimate changeEnvironmental scienceGlobal warmingGreenhouse gasGlobal changeKyoto ProtocolOzoneEcologyMeteorologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments have been highly effective in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer, preventing global increases in solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B; 280–315 nm) at Earth's surface, and reducing global warming. While ongoing and projected changes in UV-B radiation and climate still pose a threat to human health, food security, air and water quality, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and construction materials and fabrics, the Montreal Protocol continues to play a critical role in protecting Earth's inhabitants and ecosystems by addressing many of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Montreal Protocol and its Amendments have been highly effective in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer and preventing global increases in solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B; 280–315 nm) at Earth's surface (McKenzie et al., 2019). This international agreement has also been one of the most important societal actions to mitigate global warming, as many of the ozone-depleting substances and their substitutes that are regulated by the Montreal Protocol are also potent greenhouse gases (Velders et al., 2007). Ozone depletion itself contributes to climate change in some regions (Robinson & Erickson III, 2015), and climate change modifies the exposure of humans, plants, animals, and materials to UV-B as well as UV-A radiation (315–400 nm; Barnes et al., 2019). Thus, changes in stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate are inextricably linked in a number of critical ways that influence human health and the environment (Figure 1). The Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) of the United Nations Environment Programme regularly assesses the interactive effects of changes in stratospheric ozone, UV radiation, and climate on the environment. Findings from our updates (Neale et al., 2021) and full assessments (EEAP 2018 Assessment; https://pubs.rsc.org/ja/journals/articlecollectionlanding?sercode=pp&themeid=034015c8-12de-4196-9526-18090345cf96) indicate that, because of the Montreal Protocol, changes in surface UV-B radiation over the past 20 years have been relatively small (ca. <±4% per decade). For most regions over this period, changes in cloud cover and aerosols have had a larger effect than changes in stratospheric ozone on variation in UV radiation. Climate change is exerting an increasing effect on exposure to UV radiation as a consequence of changes in phenology, cloud cover, aerosols, snow and ice cover, species distributions, water quality, and extreme weather events. Moreover, stratospheric ozone depletion over Antarctica is strongly linked to the climate of the Southern Hemisphere (e.g., Damiani et al., 2020). It is estimated that by 2050 the Montreal Protocol will have prevented global warming over land of 1.5–4°C, depending on the region (Goyal et al., 2019). While their magnitude has been limited by the Montreal Protocol, ongoing and projected changes in UV radiation and climate still pose a threat to food security, air and water quality, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and construction materials and fabrics. Exposure to solar UV radiation increases the decomposition of organic matter in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, which releases carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere—an important feedback effect on the climate system. Modeling studies estimate that the Montreal Protocol will prevent millions of cases of skin cancers and cataracts in the United States alone. However, exposure to solar UV radiation also has benefits for health. Most notably, it generates vitamin D (which is critical for bone and muscle health), disinfects surface waters of pathogens, and also plays an important role in immune function, an effect that is important in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Balancing the positive and negative effects of UV exposure on human health would have been difficult to achieve in a world without the Montreal Protocol. In today's rapidly changing world, the Montreal Protocol continues to play a critical role in protecting Earth's inhabitants and ecosystems by addressing many of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Figure 1; Neale et al., 2021). We wish to acknowledge the following EEAP members and co-authors who have contributed to our assessments on which this Letter is based: P.J. Aucamp, A.T. Banaszak, L.S. Bruckman, S.N. Byrne, B. Føreid, D.-P. Häder, L.M. Hollestein, W.-C. Hou, S. Hylander, M.A.K. Jansen, A.R. Klekociuk, J.B. Liley, J. Longstreth, R.M. Lucas, J. Martinez-Abaigar, K. McNeill, C.M. Olsen, L.E. Rhodes, K.C. Rose, T. Schikowski, K.R. Solomon, B. Sulzberger, J.E. Ukpebor, Q.-W. Wang, S.-Å. Wängberg, C.C. White, S. Yazar, A.R. Young, P.J. Young, L. Zhu, and M. Zhu. The authors declare no competing financial or other interests. Data sharing not applicable—no new data generated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Change BiologySame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207