MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3195896590 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.08.024

Commentary: The “girdle” Ross procedure: An adjunct to prevent late autograft failure in all Ross patients?

2021· editorial· en· W3195896590 sur OpenAlexaff
Charles Laurin, François Dagenais

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Établissements canadiensInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de QuébecUniversité Laval
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRoss procedureMedicineSurgeryStenosisElectrical conduitProsthesisAdjunctCardiologyAortic valve replacement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageThe external reinforced Dacron conduit is a promising adjunct to prevent late autograft dilatation especially suited for patients with annular dilatation.See Article page 372. The external reinforced Dacron conduit is a promising adjunct to prevent late autograft dilatation especially suited for patients with annular dilatation. See Article page 372. The Ross procedure offers an excellent alternative to an aortic prosthesis in young patients with aortic valve stenosis. Published 20-year outcomes have established the safety and the superiority of the pulmonary autograft compared with conventional prosthesis in this setting. Whether to perform a Ross procedure in aortic insufficiency with annular dilatation is debated, owing to an increased late autograft failure by dilatation. Starnes and colleagues1Starnes V.A. Bowdish M.E. Cohen R.G. Baker C.J. Elsayed R.S. The Ross procedure utilizing the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adults.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 10: 372-376Scopus (3) Google Scholar describe a modification of the full root replacement technique where the pulmonary autograft is reinforced with an external Dacron conduit. The rationale behind this modification is to support and stabilize the autograft, hence preventing late dilatation. The authors are to be congratulated for the excellent mid-term results with a very low late failure rate and excellent long-term survival. As published by others, the surgeon's Ross learning curve has a clear effect on late outcomes. Better outcomes of the Ross procedure are reported after 75 to 100 cases/surgeon.2Bouhout I. Ghoneim A. Poirier N. Cartier R. Demers P. Perrault L.P. et al.Impact of the learning curve on early outcomes following the Ross procedure.Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33: 493-500Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar In the present cohort of 129 patients, the unwrapped technique (71 patients) was performed in the early stage of the center's experience. Only 18% of the wrapped cohort was followed for 10 years, and 48% have 5 years of follow-up. Data presented are more representative of the early- to mid-term outcomes after the wrapped technique and thus mandate longer follow-up to assess true benefits on late reintervention. Potential autograft dilatation may occur at the annulus level, the pulmonary sinus, and the new sinotubular junction. Aortic regurgitation and annular dilatation are associated with a greater risk of reintervention. Autograft dilatation is reported to potentially begin before hospital discharge, stressing the importance of the surgical technique.3Hokken R.B. Takkenberg J.J. van Herwerden L.A. Roelandt J.R. Bogers A.J. Excessive pulmonary autograft dilatation causes important aortic regurgitation.Heart. 2003; 89: 933-934Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar In the context of aortic regurgitation, implanting the autograft below the annulus, performing an external annuloplasty with a rim of Dacron, or adding a short interposition graft to stabilize the sinotubular junction are all techniques described, tailored to prevent dilatation of the autograft while minimizing deformation of the autograft and preserving the hemodynamic characteristics of the living autograft.4Bouhout I. Ghoneim A. Tousch M. Stevens L.M. Semplonius T. Tarabzoni M. et al.Impact of a tailored surgical approach on autograft root dimensions in patients undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic regurgitation.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 959-967Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar Encasing the autograft in a Dacron tube lessens the systolic–diastolic motion of the pulmonary root, a mechanism known to contribute to the long-term durability of the pulmonary valve. In addition, the restriction on the sinuses imposed by the Dacron graft may affect the opening of the cusps and the coronary flow reserve. As mentioned by the authors, the surgeon must be very careful in preventing distortion of the autograft while sewing the tube to the autograft, which could lead to an unfortunate early valve failure. Using a meticulous and reproducible technique, the authors show promising results, but there is an unequivocal need for long-term results. The inclusion technique should be part of the armamentarium of the surgeon performing Ross procedures and may increase the range of eligible patients to include patients with aortic annular dilatation. However, with the current knowledge, this surgical approach should be tailored to the patient's anatomy rather than applying the “girdle” effect to all Ross procedures. Until longer follow-up is available, we believe that external support of the autograft should be limited to patients at high risk of late autograft failure, mainly patients with aortic annular dilatation. The Ross procedure utilizing the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adultsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 10PreviewA retrospective cohort study was conducted in which 129 adult patients with bicuspid aortic valves underwent the Ross procedure with either a standard root inclusion technique or a modified technique whereby the pulmonary autograft is wrapped in a vascular conduit. Primary outcomes were survival and the need for pulmonary autograft reintervention. Competing risk analysis demonstrated the wrapped technique reduced pulmonary autograft reintervention. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,179
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207