MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195896590 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.08.024

Commentary: The “girdle” Ross procedure: An adjunct to prevent late autograft failure in all Ross patients?

2021· editorial· en· W3195896590 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Laurin, François Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoss procedureMedicineSurgeryStenosisElectrical conduitProsthesisAdjunctCardiologyAortic valve replacement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageThe external reinforced Dacron conduit is a promising adjunct to prevent late autograft dilatation especially suited for patients with annular dilatation.See Article page 372. The external reinforced Dacron conduit is a promising adjunct to prevent late autograft dilatation especially suited for patients with annular dilatation. See Article page 372. The Ross procedure offers an excellent alternative to an aortic prosthesis in young patients with aortic valve stenosis. Published 20-year outcomes have established the safety and the superiority of the pulmonary autograft compared with conventional prosthesis in this setting. Whether to perform a Ross procedure in aortic insufficiency with annular dilatation is debated, owing to an increased late autograft failure by dilatation. Starnes and colleagues1Starnes V.A. Bowdish M.E. Cohen R.G. Baker C.J. Elsayed R.S. The Ross procedure utilizing the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adults.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 10: 372-376Scopus (3) Google Scholar describe a modification of the full root replacement technique where the pulmonary autograft is reinforced with an external Dacron conduit. The rationale behind this modification is to support and stabilize the autograft, hence preventing late dilatation. The authors are to be congratulated for the excellent mid-term results with a very low late failure rate and excellent long-term survival. As published by others, the surgeon's Ross learning curve has a clear effect on late outcomes. Better outcomes of the Ross procedure are reported after 75 to 100 cases/surgeon.2Bouhout I. Ghoneim A. Poirier N. Cartier R. Demers P. Perrault L.P. et al.Impact of the learning curve on early outcomes following the Ross procedure.Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33: 493-500Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar In the present cohort of 129 patients, the unwrapped technique (71 patients) was performed in the early stage of the center's experience. Only 18% of the wrapped cohort was followed for 10 years, and 48% have 5 years of follow-up. Data presented are more representative of the early- to mid-term outcomes after the wrapped technique and thus mandate longer follow-up to assess true benefits on late reintervention. Potential autograft dilatation may occur at the annulus level, the pulmonary sinus, and the new sinotubular junction. Aortic regurgitation and annular dilatation are associated with a greater risk of reintervention. Autograft dilatation is reported to potentially begin before hospital discharge, stressing the importance of the surgical technique.3Hokken R.B. Takkenberg J.J. van Herwerden L.A. Roelandt J.R. Bogers A.J. Excessive pulmonary autograft dilatation causes important aortic regurgitation.Heart. 2003; 89: 933-934Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar In the context of aortic regurgitation, implanting the autograft below the annulus, performing an external annuloplasty with a rim of Dacron, or adding a short interposition graft to stabilize the sinotubular junction are all techniques described, tailored to prevent dilatation of the autograft while minimizing deformation of the autograft and preserving the hemodynamic characteristics of the living autograft.4Bouhout I. Ghoneim A. Tousch M. Stevens L.M. Semplonius T. Tarabzoni M. et al.Impact of a tailored surgical approach on autograft root dimensions in patients undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic regurgitation.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56: 959-967Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar Encasing the autograft in a Dacron tube lessens the systolic–diastolic motion of the pulmonary root, a mechanism known to contribute to the long-term durability of the pulmonary valve. In addition, the restriction on the sinuses imposed by the Dacron graft may affect the opening of the cusps and the coronary flow reserve. As mentioned by the authors, the surgeon must be very careful in preventing distortion of the autograft while sewing the tube to the autograft, which could lead to an unfortunate early valve failure. Using a meticulous and reproducible technique, the authors show promising results, but there is an unequivocal need for long-term results. The inclusion technique should be part of the armamentarium of the surgeon performing Ross procedures and may increase the range of eligible patients to include patients with aortic annular dilatation. However, with the current knowledge, this surgical approach should be tailored to the patient's anatomy rather than applying the “girdle” effect to all Ross procedures. Until longer follow-up is available, we believe that external support of the autograft should be limited to patients at high risk of late autograft failure, mainly patients with aortic annular dilatation. The Ross procedure utilizing the pulmonary autograft inclusion technique in adultsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 10PreviewA retrospective cohort study was conducted in which 129 adult patients with bicuspid aortic valves underwent the Ross procedure with either a standard root inclusion technique or a modified technique whereby the pulmonary autograft is wrapped in a vascular conduit. Primary outcomes were survival and the need for pulmonary autograft reintervention. Competing risk analysis demonstrated the wrapped technique reduced pulmonary autograft reintervention. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207