MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3196373415 · doi:10.1353/abr.2021.0080

Interventions: An Interview with C. Dale Young by Frederick Luis Aldama

2021· article· en· W3196373415 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frederick Luis Aldama

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book review · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueBorges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExpansivePoetryStudioPassionPerformance artNarrativeArt historyDramaArtHistoryLiteraturePsychologyVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

InterventionsAn Interview with C. Dale Young by Frederick Luis Aldama Frederick Luis Aldama Click for larger view View full resolution An M. D. and award-winning poet, fiction author, editor and teacher, C. Dale Young stands among our greats: Avicenna, John Keats, Anton Chekhov, Nawal El Saadawi, Atul Gawande, Rafael Campo, and, of course, William Carlos Williams. Like Williams, C. Dale is mixed Latinx. Like Williams, C. Dale seeks a unity of poetic effect built in and through objects and actions, more than ideas. Through masterful calibrations of sounds and rhythms as well as lyric with narrative form, his poems guide and glide us into rich textures of place and the alpha to omega of a Whitmanian expansive existence. Already at an early age C. Dale cultivated a passion for the arts and sciences. He would later parlay this into undergraduate studies of molecular biology, poetry, and studio art at Boston College. Our twenty-first-century renaissance man, C. Dale deepened his knowledge in these areas, receiving an MFA and MD from the University of Florida. Today, C. Dale writes, publishes, practices medicine, and teaches future generations of MFAs. With Prometeo (2021), C. Dale adds to his extraordinary body of work, including, The Day Underneath the Day (2001); The Second Person (2007), Torn (2011), The Halo (2016), and Affliction (2018). Gentle, graceful, and drop-of-pen attentive, C. Dale Young recently shared with me deep insights into his creative process, worldview, and life. Frederick Luis Aldama: It’s been too long, C. Dale, since our last interview. And now with the dropping of Prometeo, yet again you’ve taken the poetic form to new extraordinary heights. There’s so much that resonates with your earlier work, and yet you take me, my heart, and my head to a whole new place. All the poems work so beautifully together. Did you conceive of Prometeo as an organic whole? C. Dale Young: I wish I could say that that’s how it worked. But that’s never how it’s worked for any of my books. I honestly never have any sense of a book until I’m almost two-thirds through writing the poems. I have this kind of joke that if I knew what the book was going to be, I would then ruin all the poems. That I would start trying to tailor the poems and it would be disastrous. I think part of the reason that a lot of my books feel coherent is that I’m an obsessive-compulsive person. I tend to come back at things over and over, trying to understand them in different ways. That’s what holds a lot of the books together. I didn’t appreciate how much Prometeo was in conversation with other books of mine until I got the very first copy and sat down and read it. I was surprised. I discovered a lot of linkages between these poems and earlier poems. I wrote the first of these poems in 2013. And I think I wrote the last of the poems in late 2018, almost 2019. And I think it was around 2017 that I had a sense of the book. FLA: You’ve chosen to publish Prometeo and other collections with the Four Way Press. Why? CDY: It’s partly technical and legal. My very first book, The Day Underneath the Day, was published by Northwestern University Press. They did not have a right of first refusal. When I approached them with the second book, The Second Person, they never rejected it, but it just kind of sat there; the editor that I had had left the press, and there wasn’t really a poetry editor at that time. The book was picked up by Zoo Press. It was supposed to appear at the AWP 2015 in Vancouver. I arrived and there was no table from Zoo Press. It was April 1st, so I thought it was an amazing April Fool’s joke. In fact, there was a big scandal. The director of Zoo Press had taken all the money. They never published the book. I was teaching at Warren Wilson, and Martha Rhodes, the director of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,224
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican book review/˜The œAmerican book reviewMême sujetBorges, Kipling, and Jewish IdentityTravaux en français237 207