MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W319779635

Fueling the Future: The Prospects for Russian Oil and Gas

2002· article· en· W319779635 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fiona Hill, Florence Fee

Notice bibliographique

RevueDemokratizatsiya The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOffensiveMiddle EastPetroleum industryTerrorismDownstream (manufacturing)PetroleumEconomyInternational tradePolitical scienceEconomicsLawEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Following the terrorist attacks against the United States on 11 September 2001, growing tensions in American relations with Middle East states coincided with the efforts of the Organization of Petroleum-Exporting Countries (OPEC) to impose production cuts to shore up petroleum prices. U.S. plans to overthrow Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq, the worsening crisis in Israel and Palestine, a backlash in Saudi Arabia against long-term U.S. military presence, and the possibility that it would become the staging ground for an attack on Iraq all led to questions in Washington, D.C., about the wisdom of continuing to rely on Middle East oil. Discussions of possible alternatives threw the spotlight on Russia, along with other oil-producing areas in the Caspian Basin and West Africa. Since 1998, Russia's oil industry has experienced a significant revival after a cataclysmic collapse in output in the 1990s. Some of its oil companies have achieved significant production increases, produced ambitious plans to break into new energy markets, expanded into international upstream and downstream operations, and launched a public relations offensive to present themselves as players in the global economy. (1) Against this backdrop, Russia, which is not a member of OPEC, mounted a fierce public resistance to the organization's demands that it cut its production and exports. Ultimately, in December 2001, agreed to a token export reduction of 150,000 barrels per day for the winter quarter. That reflected normal seasonal cuts implemented by Russian oil companies operating in the extreme cold of Siberia and bottled in by winter port restrictions. Moscow's snub to OPEC was obvious. Russia suddenly became one of the new great hopes of Western efforts to diversify U.S. and world oil supplies beyond the Middle East and Persian Gulf. As American energy secretary Spencer Abraham noted during a November 2001 visit to Moscow, Russia seemed to be emerging as a separate nucleus of the energy equation. (2) In the Washington Post in December 2001, David Ignatius asserted that Moscow is on its way to becoming the next Houston--the global capital of energy. (3) By January 2002, Russia's President Putin had been hailed by a Canadian newspaper as the world's new oil Czar, (4) and the Russian media was replete with commentary on Russia's role as the new power broker in international energy markets. In an extended article in the March/April 2002 issue of the preeminent American journal Foreign Affairs, two energy analysts went so far as to suggest that Russia--together with the energy-rich states of the former Soviet Union clustered around the Caspian Basin (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan)--was poised to challenge Saudi Arabia for global energy dominance. Russia, they argued, could soon displace Saudi Arabia and OPEC in oil markets in the United States, Europe, and Asia. (5) The authors, along with media commentators, saw increases in Russian oil production and new reserve finds in the Caspian Basin as evidence of substantial future export capacity. In addition, they depicted the Russian energy industry as an independent actor, emancipated from state control (unlike the state-held oil companies of OPEC members), which was eager to help the United States and the West break free from OPEC dependency by becoming a reliable, long-term energy partner. Certainly, the Soviet Union was a major international energy player in the 1980s, and Russia has assumed much of that mantle since its dissolution, but in 2002 Russia's grip on the attention of the media and international energy analysts is due more to a confluence of events and circumstance than a serious assessment of the country's energy capabilities. In most discussions of Russian energy, the extent of Russian oil production capacity is not questioned. Differences between Russian gas and oil assets are not distinguished. Little distinction is made between Russian energy and that of other Caspian Basin states, and the relationship between the Russian energy industry and the state is not questioned. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDemokratizatsiya The Journal of Post-Soviet DemocratizationMême sujetGlobal Energy Security and PolicyTravaux en français237 207