A scoping review of research that examines El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired music education programmes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Dominant discourses promote El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired music education programmes as positively transforming young lives through social inclusion and musical excellence. However, critics have raised concerns that the El Sistema model has little support from objective, evidence‐based research. To address this issue, the authors conducted a review of peer‐reviewed articles published in English between 2010 and 2020, in order to bring together descriptions and findings of research examining El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired programmes. Following a scoping review method, the authors identified 30 relevant articles for detailed review. The reported studies were identified to address programme impacts (including musical growth, academic achievement, cognitive development, and social‐emotional development) and programme design (e.g., pedagogical approaches, curricular focus, and programme challenges). Reported research methods included randomised control trials, longitudinal randomised studies, qualitative interview studies, a quasi‐experimental pre‐post design study, and ethnographic studies. Overall, the results of this scoping review strongly suggest that Sistema‐inspired music education programmes have great potential for positively impacting students, particularly in terms of musical and social‐emotional development, with less convincing but nevertheless reasonable evidence of increased academic achievement and cognitive development. The authors conclude that realising the potential of El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired programming requires context‐ and student‐specific teaching, curricula, and community support. Context and implications Rationale for this study Dominant discourses promote El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired music education as positively transforming young lives through social inclusion and musical excellence. However, critics have raised concerns that the Sistema model has little support from objective, evidence‐based research. To find out what existing research has actually revealed, a review was conducted of peer‐reviewed articles published in English between 2010 and 2020, bringing together descriptions and findings of research that has examined El Sistema and Sistema‐inspired programming. Why the new findings matter This review provides clear details of research that reports both the benefits and limitations of Sistema music education in terms of program impacts and program design. Implications for policy and practice Results suggest that Sistema music education has great potential for positively impacting students, particularly in terms of musical and social‐emotional development, with less convincing but some evidence of increased academic achievement and cognitive development. Accordingly, policymakers would do well to focus advocacy and improvement efforts on social‐emotional benefits. Findings suggest Sistema educators would do well to adopt more learner‐centred approaches, particularly those that promote self‐expression, creativity, and agency; resist the privileging of Eurocentric music traditions; actively value and celebrate diverse musics, backgrounds, and cultural expressions; and bring teaching methods in line with contemporary K‐12 and community music education practices.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,032 | 0,111 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,031 | 0,030 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».