Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It has been great to be involved with the Journal for the past 5 years as a reviewer and then as an Associated Editor. Becoming the Journal's interim Editor-in-Chief is an honor and a privilege. I must thank Dr. Sean Collins for helping my editorial career. He has been the only Editor-in-Chief that I have worked with, and he has taught me the essential balance between meeting the needs of the Journal's audience and scientific rigor. I must also thank the Academy, Associated Editors, and the Editorial Board for trusting me with this important task. I will make sure to continue the great work the Journal has been doing for the past decade. In this issue, we are pleased to offer readers a variety of articles including a literature review, a clinical perspective, 2 research reports, and a case report, which demonstrates the rich and diverse group of authors conducting research in our field. Ricard et al1 put together a literature review article summarizing their 2021 CSM presentation about ‟The Year (2020) in review.” Here, the authors reviewed relevant clinical information in several cardiovascular and pulmonary topics such as intensive care unit, cardiac surgery, sex and gender, heart transplant, inspiratory muscle training, and more. In addition, Bitzer et al2 share in their clinical perspective a screening algorithm to help guide physical and occupational therapy evaluation readiness and treatment decisions for patients with COVID-19 in the acute care setting. Some of the screening factors included defining and identifying stages of disease severity, assessment of laboratory values, monitoring oxygen stability, and other factors impacting patient mobility. In an international collaboration from Canada, France, and Iran, Kasawara et al3 studied sex differences in abdominal exercises and respiratory pressures and the relationship between mobility, pneumonia, and hospital stay and costs. The authors found that the twist curl-up exercise elicited larger abdominal muscles' activation than the pelvic tilt exercise, and this activation is different between young healthy males and females. In addition, from Australia, Lloyd et al4 studied the relationship between mobility, pneumonia, and hospital stay and costs. The authors conducted a longitudinal (12 months) observational study of 347 individuals hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia to determine the relationship between mobility level and hospital stay and costs. The results demonstrated that mobility deterioration during acute pneumonia has a significant impact on hospital stay and costs. Finally, Stam et al5 present a very interesting case study about cardiovascular compromise in patients with spinal cord injury, focusing on autonomic dysreflexia, cardiac pacing abnormality, and orthostatic hypotension. The authors present here a 62-year-old man with spinal cord injury with several cardiac and hemodynamic events that required special management form both the medical and physical therapy perspective. These articles, and those already published ahead-of-print, confirm that the Journal is in a strong position. I look forward to continuing our mission of disseminating relevant clinical and scientific research in the area of cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy. This is the way to keep the torch burning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».