Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been great to be involved with the Journal for the past 5 years as a reviewer and then as an Associated Editor. Becoming the Journal's interim Editor-in-Chief is an honor and a privilege. I must thank Dr. Sean Collins for helping my editorial career. He has been the only Editor-in-Chief that I have worked with, and he has taught me the essential balance between meeting the needs of the Journal's audience and scientific rigor. I must also thank the Academy, Associated Editors, and the Editorial Board for trusting me with this important task. I will make sure to continue the great work the Journal has been doing for the past decade. In this issue, we are pleased to offer readers a variety of articles including a literature review, a clinical perspective, 2 research reports, and a case report, which demonstrates the rich and diverse group of authors conducting research in our field. Ricard et al1 put together a literature review article summarizing their 2021 CSM presentation about ‟The Year (2020) in review.” Here, the authors reviewed relevant clinical information in several cardiovascular and pulmonary topics such as intensive care unit, cardiac surgery, sex and gender, heart transplant, inspiratory muscle training, and more. In addition, Bitzer et al2 share in their clinical perspective a screening algorithm to help guide physical and occupational therapy evaluation readiness and treatment decisions for patients with COVID-19 in the acute care setting. Some of the screening factors included defining and identifying stages of disease severity, assessment of laboratory values, monitoring oxygen stability, and other factors impacting patient mobility. In an international collaboration from Canada, France, and Iran, Kasawara et al3 studied sex differences in abdominal exercises and respiratory pressures and the relationship between mobility, pneumonia, and hospital stay and costs. The authors found that the twist curl-up exercise elicited larger abdominal muscles' activation than the pelvic tilt exercise, and this activation is different between young healthy males and females. In addition, from Australia, Lloyd et al4 studied the relationship between mobility, pneumonia, and hospital stay and costs. The authors conducted a longitudinal (12 months) observational study of 347 individuals hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia to determine the relationship between mobility level and hospital stay and costs. The results demonstrated that mobility deterioration during acute pneumonia has a significant impact on hospital stay and costs. Finally, Stam et al5 present a very interesting case study about cardiovascular compromise in patients with spinal cord injury, focusing on autonomic dysreflexia, cardiac pacing abnormality, and orthostatic hypotension. The authors present here a 62-year-old man with spinal cord injury with several cardiac and hemodynamic events that required special management form both the medical and physical therapy perspective. These articles, and those already published ahead-of-print, confirm that the Journal is in a strong position. I look forward to continuing our mission of disseminating relevant clinical and scientific research in the area of cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy. This is the way to keep the torch burning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".