Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.
RevueThe Lancet HIV · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipInstitute of Infection and ImmunityClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los AngelesDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentDivision of Mathematical SciencesFogarty International CenterNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesResearch Management Centre, International Islamic University MalaysiaHorizon 2020National Drug and Alcohol Research CentreGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape TownQatar National Research FundDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthDebre Tabor UniversityDebre Markos UniversityForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeRijksuniversiteit GroningenAteneo de Manila UniversityWuhan UniversityJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDSFrankfurt University of Applied SciencesI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityKurdistan University Of Medical SciencesGeneralitat de CatalunyaUniverzita Karlova v PrazeUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaKwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyUniversité de NantesUniversity of Health and Allied SciencesUniversitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie "Carol Davila" BucureştiAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesUnited Arab Emirates UniversityCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of AdelaideWestern Sydney UniversityA.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers Fond til almene FormaalDepartment of Medicine, Ottawa HospitalUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRajshahi UniversityCalifornia Department of Fish and GameUniversity of Cape TownCenter for Drug Use and HIV ResearchHaramaya UniversityAbdul Wali Khan University MardanUniversità degli Studi di GenovaAlfaisal UniversityUniversity of TasmaniaUniversity of WaterlooUniwersytet ŁódzkiKing Abdulaziz UniversityDepartment of Health and Aged Care, Australian GovernmentCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsSouth African Medical Research CouncilBundesministerium für GesundheitInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliEuropean CommissionAhmadu Bello UniversityElse Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of CalcuttaKing Saud UniversityNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungPublic Health EnglandFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesFlinders UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity College LondonUniversity Grants CommissionImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUniversity of Central FloridaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBabol University of Medical SciencesWorld Health OrganizationMazandaran University of Medical SciencesGeorge Mason UniversityYork UniversityInvitaeHarvard UniversityManipal Academy of Higher EducationDeanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz UniversityAustralian GovernmentUniversitat de BarcelonaImperial College LondonKing's College LondonTechnische Universität BerlinNational Institute of Mental HealthCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of Agriculture, FaisalabadInstitute for Health Metrics and EvaluationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungChandigarh UniversityIran University of Medical SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityWellcome TrustRussian Science FoundationUniversity of California, Los AngelesSultan Qaboos UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaXiamen UniversityStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical SciencesBahir Dar UniversityEIT HealthMcMaster UniversityNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsUniversity of JeddahOttawa Hospital Research InstituteSecretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónJazan UniversityUniversity of Central PunjabHamad Medical CorporationDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Los AngelesMiddlesex UniversityKasturba Medical College, ManipalNational Institute on Drug AbuseBirmingham City UniversityUniversity of New South WalesWashington University in St. LouisUniversity of PittsburghYale UniversityVirginia Marine Resources CommissionMekelle UniversityLa Trobe UniversityCurtin University of TechnologyBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Mots-clésMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Environmental healthMen who have sex with menEpidemic controlGlobal healthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DemographyVirologyPublic healthDiseaseSyphilisPathology
Résumé
récupéré en direct d'OpenAlexBACKGROUND: The sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to end HIV/AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. Understanding the current state of the HIV epidemic and its change over time is essential to this effort. This study assesses the current sex-specific HIV burden in 204 countries and territories and measures progress in the control of the epidemic. METHODS: To estimate age-specific and sex-specific trends in 48 of 204 countries, we extended the Estimation and Projection Package Age-Sex Model to also implement the spectrum paediatric model. We used this model in cases where age and sex specific HIV-seroprevalence surveys and antenatal care-clinic sentinel surveillance data were available. For the remaining 156 of 204 locations, we developed a cohort-incidence bias adjustment to derive incidence as a function of cause-of-death data from vital registration systems. The incidence was input to a custom Spectrum model. To assess progress, we measured the percentage change in incident cases and deaths between 2010 and 2019 (threshold >75% decline), the ratio of incident cases to number of people living with HIV (incidence-to-prevalence ratio threshold <0·03), and the ratio of incident cases to deaths (incidence-to-mortality ratio threshold <1·0). FINDINGS: In 2019, there were 36·8 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 35·1-38·9) people living with HIV worldwide. There were 0·84 males (95% UI 0·78-0·91) per female living with HIV in 2019, 0·99 male infections (0·91-1·10) for every female infection, and 1·02 male deaths (0·95-1·10) per female death. Global progress in incident cases and deaths between 2010 and 2019 was driven by sub-Saharan Africa (with a 28·52% decrease in incident cases, 95% UI 19·58-35·43, and a 39·66% decrease in deaths, 36·49-42·36). Elsewhere, the incidence remained stable or increased, whereas deaths generally decreased. In 2019, the global incidence-to-prevalence ratio was 0·05 (95% UI 0·05-0·06) and the global incidence-to-mortality ratio was 1·94 (1·76-2·12). No regions met suggested thresholds for progress. INTERPRETATION: Sub-Saharan Africa had both the highest HIV burden and the greatest progress between 1990 and 2019. The number of incident cases and deaths in males and females approached parity in 2019, although there remained more females with HIV than males with HIV. Globally, the HIV epidemic is far from the UNAIDS benchmarks on progress metrics. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Institute of Mental Health of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the National Institute on Aging of the NIH.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,264
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,239
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle
