MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3203516636 · doi:10.7939/r3vx06k01

Integrated Systems Modeling for Irrigation Expansion at the River Basin Scale

2018· article· en· W3203516636 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohamed E. Ammar

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueWater resources management and optimization
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScale (ratio)IrrigationHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementGeographyCartographyGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Understanding the complexities and quantifying the impacts of expanding irrigation in the presence of ongoing socioeconomic developments, population growth, climate change, and policy factors is a challenging task. Simulation models can facilitate such a task and allow visualizing outcomes; they can thus recommend specific policy reforms or suggest a different policy. However, such tools are often challenged by the need to integrate various processes that operate at different spatial or temporal scales, and by the need to produce models that characterize impacts at scales in which policy decisions are made – typically at river basin scale and over long time periods. The central theme of this thesis is to capture the complexity of irrigation expansion for policy assessment under climate change using a systems approach, and to find a balance between temporal modeling scales for integrating models that allows long-term agricultural and water policy assessments while maintaining accurate crop modeling. To this end, potential water policies to address water scarcity at the river basin were extracted from the literature to develop a list for modelers as a starting point for integrated modeling and for policymakers for strategic planning. The list has 51 policy interventions for the agricultural water sector, 55 for the municipal, and 31 for the industrial with relevant citations of successful modeling studies. Further, while process-based crop growth models that run on a daily time step are typically superior, knowledge and computational constraints in integrated assessments require a compromise between the temporal scales at which component processes occur, which may be short or long, and the longer scales of interest to decision makers for policy assessment. Moreover, process-based models may rely on fine-scaled data series that are hard to obtain, time-consuming to generate, or that may simply be unavailable. Therefore, a water-driven process-based crop growth model, CropSD, was developed in a System Dynamics framework based on FAO’s AquaCrop model to run daily, semi-weekly, and weekly simulations in conjunction with weekly weather input data. The aim was to examine the ability of coarser simulations to reproduce the behavior of a fine-scale model such that it can be integrated into other socioeconomic, environmental, or hydrologic models to broaden the scope of their applications. Model skill for simulating crop biomass and yield and water demands at different simulation time steps was assessed with weekly weather input data for a number of hypothetical farms including barley Alberta in Canada, maize in Nebraska in the US, and potatoes in Brussels in Belgium to represent a range of crops and growing environments. The R2 statistic showed a value of 0.95 for daily simulations, 0.83 for semi-weekly simulations, and 0.72 for weekly simulations of crop yields. The results suggest that semi-weekly and weekly simulations provided a compromise between accuracy and longer timescale for process-based crop growth model to be used in integrated assessments. CropSD was then integrated with a socioeconomic system dynamics model to describe the “big picture” of expanding the irrigation sector of Alberta in Canada. The resulting integrated model, Alberta Irrigation Scenario Simulator (AISS), captures the feedback loops between irrigation expansion, and its technical, social, economic, environmental processes, and policy choices. The model was used to simulate the impacts a set of seven scenario groups that covered a range of plausible expansion pathways for Alberta’s irrigation sector. Impacts of climate change, socioeconomic changes, and policy interventions on crop yields, economic returns, irrigation demands, and water withdrawals were assessed. Results showed increasing trends for dry matter crop yields to 2040 for the six major irrigated crops of Alberta with an increase per year of 0.071 t ha-1 for alfalfa, 0.04 t ha-1 for barley, 0.031 t ha-1 for canola, 0.061 t ha-1 for potatoes, 0.065 t ha-1 for sugar beets, and 0.039 t ha-1 for wheat for the high GHG emission climate scenario (RCP 8.5). Irrigation water demands increased by 11% in 2036-2040 based on the expansion plans and policy interventions by the Government of Alberta (GoA) under RCP 8.5. Increasing the reservoirs storage capacity by 5% did not offset the decreased water supply simulated by the SWAT hydrologic model of Alberta in 2035. However, an increase in storage by 10% allowed expansion beyond the goals by the GoA to reach 700,000 hectares.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,066

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,149
Écart entre enseignants0,141 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetWater resources management and optimizationTravaux en français237 207