MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3203516636 · doi:10.7939/r3vx06k01

Integrated Systems Modeling for Irrigation Expansion at the River Basin Scale

2018· article· en· W3203516636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohamed E. Ammar

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)IrrigationHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementGeographyCartographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the complexities and quantifying the impacts of expanding irrigation in the presence of ongoing socioeconomic developments, population growth, climate change, and policy factors is a challenging task. Simulation models can facilitate such a task and allow visualizing outcomes; they can thus recommend specific policy reforms or suggest a different policy. However, such tools are often challenged by the need to integrate various processes that operate at different spatial or temporal scales, and by the need to produce models that characterize impacts at scales in which policy decisions are made – typically at river basin scale and over long time periods. The central theme of this thesis is to capture the complexity of irrigation expansion for policy assessment under climate change using a systems approach, and to find a balance between temporal modeling scales for integrating models that allows long-term agricultural and water policy assessments while maintaining accurate crop modeling. To this end, potential water policies to address water scarcity at the river basin were extracted from the literature to develop a list for modelers as a starting point for integrated modeling and for policymakers for strategic planning. The list has 51 policy interventions for the agricultural water sector, 55 for the municipal, and 31 for the industrial with relevant citations of successful modeling studies. Further, while process-based crop growth models that run on a daily time step are typically superior, knowledge and computational constraints in integrated assessments require a compromise between the temporal scales at which component processes occur, which may be short or long, and the longer scales of interest to decision makers for policy assessment. Moreover, process-based models may rely on fine-scaled data series that are hard to obtain, time-consuming to generate, or that may simply be unavailable. Therefore, a water-driven process-based crop growth model, CropSD, was developed in a System Dynamics framework based on FAO’s AquaCrop model to run daily, semi-weekly, and weekly simulations in conjunction with weekly weather input data. The aim was to examine the ability of coarser simulations to reproduce the behavior of a fine-scale model such that it can be integrated into other socioeconomic, environmental, or hydrologic models to broaden the scope of their applications. Model skill for simulating crop biomass and yield and water demands at different simulation time steps was assessed with weekly weather input data for a number of hypothetical farms including barley Alberta in Canada, maize in Nebraska in the US, and potatoes in Brussels in Belgium to represent a range of crops and growing environments. The R2 statistic showed a value of 0.95 for daily simulations, 0.83 for semi-weekly simulations, and 0.72 for weekly simulations of crop yields. The results suggest that semi-weekly and weekly simulations provided a compromise between accuracy and longer timescale for process-based crop growth model to be used in integrated assessments. CropSD was then integrated with a socioeconomic system dynamics model to describe the “big picture” of expanding the irrigation sector of Alberta in Canada. The resulting integrated model, Alberta Irrigation Scenario Simulator (AISS), captures the feedback loops between irrigation expansion, and its technical, social, economic, environmental processes, and policy choices. The model was used to simulate the impacts a set of seven scenario groups that covered a range of plausible expansion pathways for Alberta’s irrigation sector. Impacts of climate change, socioeconomic changes, and policy interventions on crop yields, economic returns, irrigation demands, and water withdrawals were assessed. Results showed increasing trends for dry matter crop yields to 2040 for the six major irrigated crops of Alberta with an increase per year of 0.071 t ha-1 for alfalfa, 0.04 t ha-1 for barley, 0.031 t ha-1 for canola, 0.061 t ha-1 for potatoes, 0.065 t ha-1 for sugar beets, and 0.039 t ha-1 for wheat for the high GHG emission climate scenario (RCP 8.5). Irrigation water demands increased by 11% in 2036-2040 based on the expansion plans and policy interventions by the Government of Alberta (GoA) under RCP 8.5. Increasing the reservoirs storage capacity by 5% did not offset the decreased water supply simulated by the SWAT hydrologic model of Alberta in 2035. However, an increase in storage by 10% allowed expansion beyond the goals by the GoA to reach 700,000 hectares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.149
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207