Notice bibliographique
Résumé
reason to turn again to work of F.M. Dostoevsky's - his 200th anniversary - is both unique and ordinary. Unique, because such an important date itself obliges a lot. Ordinary - because even without jubilee occasions, turning to texts of great writer has long become commonplace for any thinking researcher. Moreover, nevertheless, realizing both circumstances, authors of jubilee issue took liberty, if not to try to find something little spoken connection with Dostoevsky, then nevertheless speak out taking into account height of years passed after his life. The first article is written by Denis Berezhnov, a postgraduate student at Moscow State University. It is dedicated to aesthetic-utilitarian debate developed by Dostoevsky Demons, which has become especially relevant for our time. following two articles - by Sergei Nikolsky (Institute of Philosophy RAS) and Grigory Tulchinsky (National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg) directly correlate writer's thoughts with problems significant for Soviet era. first article - through study of temporal existential meanings; second - through analysis of consequences of implementing program of social reorganization. Continues issue article by Vladimir Katasonov (Saint Cyril and Methodius Institute for Advanced Studies) dedicated to relationship between Dostoevsky and phenomenology. following three articles are devoted to peculiarities of previously little-studied aspects of Dostoevsky's works' philosophical and artistic content. Nikolai Murzin (Institute of Philosophy, RAS) analyses phenomenon of misfortune. Ksenia Koroleva, a postgraduate student at Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy of Sciences, studies phenomenon of gambling basing on Dostoevsky's novel Gambler. Yulia Erokhina (NRU Higher School of Economics) attempts to simulate image of pale world as seen novel Crime and Punishment. According to Denis Kacheev (Kostanai Branch of Chelyabinsk State University) and Sergey Kolchigin (Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies of Committee Science of Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan), Dostoevsky was one of those who began a spiritual quest Russian philosophical thought. In final article of Dostoevsky's section, Inna Tiguntsova (University of Toronto, Canada) attempted to compare his work with other writers. In her article, she compares images of birds Dostoevsky's novels Poor People and The Sorrows of Young Werther by Goethe. The rest of Studies' section consists of articles by Andrey Teslya (Institute of History St. Petersburg University; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University) The Slavophiles and the Polish Question in 1840 - 1st half of 1860s and Anton Borovikov (RANEPA, EU at St. Petersburg) Materialistic Modernization of Russian romantic nationalism. According to notes On mutual relationship of people, state and society by Ivan Aksakov (1862). The issue also contains a translation into Russian of Skinner, Valsiner and Holland's article Discerning Dialogical Self: A Theoretical and Methodological Examination of a Nepali Adolescent's Narrative. translation was done by Diana Gasparyan (NRU HSE). The book reviews' section includes reviews: by Artyom Morozov (Institute of Philosophy RAS) on Russian translation of Steve Fuller's Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power-Game; by Dmitry Davydov (Institute of Philosophy and Law of Russian Academy of Sciences (Yekaterinburg) on Russian version of D. Harvey's The Condition of Postmodernity; by Alexander Markov (RSSU) on Alexander Montlevich's Wakefulness Madness: Speculative Realism and Lucid Dreaming; and by Alexander Pavlov (Institute of Philosophy RAS) on Russian version of Bernard Perron's Silent Hill. Terror Engine.S. Nickolsky
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».