Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
reason to turn again to work of F.M. Dostoevsky's - his 200th anniversary - is both unique and ordinary. Unique, because such an important date itself obliges a lot. Ordinary - because even without jubilee occasions, turning to texts of great writer has long become commonplace for any thinking researcher. Moreover, nevertheless, realizing both circumstances, authors of jubilee issue took liberty, if not to try to find something little spoken connection with Dostoevsky, then nevertheless speak out taking into account height of years passed after his life. The first article is written by Denis Berezhnov, a postgraduate student at Moscow State University. It is dedicated to aesthetic-utilitarian debate developed by Dostoevsky Demons, which has become especially relevant for our time. following two articles - by Sergei Nikolsky (Institute of Philosophy RAS) and Grigory Tulchinsky (National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg) directly correlate writer's thoughts with problems significant for Soviet era. first article - through study of temporal existential meanings; second - through analysis of consequences of implementing program of social reorganization. Continues issue article by Vladimir Katasonov (Saint Cyril and Methodius Institute for Advanced Studies) dedicated to relationship between Dostoevsky and phenomenology. following three articles are devoted to peculiarities of previously little-studied aspects of Dostoevsky's works' philosophical and artistic content. Nikolai Murzin (Institute of Philosophy, RAS) analyses phenomenon of misfortune. Ksenia Koroleva, a postgraduate student at Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy of Sciences, studies phenomenon of gambling basing on Dostoevsky's novel Gambler. Yulia Erokhina (NRU Higher School of Economics) attempts to simulate image of pale world as seen novel Crime and Punishment. According to Denis Kacheev (Kostanai Branch of Chelyabinsk State University) and Sergey Kolchigin (Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies of Committee Science of Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan), Dostoevsky was one of those who began a spiritual quest Russian philosophical thought. In final article of Dostoevsky's section, Inna Tiguntsova (University of Toronto, Canada) attempted to compare his work with other writers. In her article, she compares images of birds Dostoevsky's novels Poor People and The Sorrows of Young Werther by Goethe. The rest of Studies' section consists of articles by Andrey Teslya (Institute of History St. Petersburg University; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University) The Slavophiles and the Polish Question in 1840 - 1st half of 1860s and Anton Borovikov (RANEPA, EU at St. Petersburg) Materialistic Modernization of Russian romantic nationalism. According to notes On mutual relationship of people, state and society by Ivan Aksakov (1862). The issue also contains a translation into Russian of Skinner, Valsiner and Holland's article Discerning Dialogical Self: A Theoretical and Methodological Examination of a Nepali Adolescent's Narrative. translation was done by Diana Gasparyan (NRU HSE). The book reviews' section includes reviews: by Artyom Morozov (Institute of Philosophy RAS) on Russian translation of Steve Fuller's Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power-Game; by Dmitry Davydov (Institute of Philosophy and Law of Russian Academy of Sciences (Yekaterinburg) on Russian version of D. Harvey's The Condition of Postmodernity; by Alexander Markov (RSSU) on Alexander Montlevich's Wakefulness Madness: Speculative Realism and Lucid Dreaming; and by Alexander Pavlov (Institute of Philosophy RAS) on Russian version of Bernard Perron's Silent Hill. Terror Engine.S. Nickolsky
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it