S1290 Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Infliximab Dose Escalation in Pediatric Patients With Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis: An Analysis of the DEVELOP Registry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Pediatric patients (pts) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) being treated with infliximab (IFX) may undergo dose escalation. DEVELOP is a multicenter, global, prospective, observational registry of long-term safety and clinical status of 6069 pts with IBD. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of IFX among pts with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who had dose escalation from 5 to 10 mg/kg q8w. Methods: In DEVELOP, data are collected every 6 months (mos). This analysis included pts (≤ 18 years) who received ≥ 1 escalated IFX dose of 10 mg/kg after ≥ 2 doses of 5 mg/kg. Data were collected within 12 mos before escalation and after escalation in the first 3 mos and at 12 (± 3) mos. Efficacy was assessed by the proportions of pts in response or remission using the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) criteria for CD and partial Mayo for UC (Table 1). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs). Results: Of the 262 dose-escalated pts (221 CD, 41 UC; 44% female; 83% white; median age 15 years), the majority (62% CD; 77% UC) were in remission at the time of dose escalation, with small changes in remission noted at 3 mos and 12 mos after escalation (Table 1). In a subgroup of 71 CD pts with active disease (PCDAI ≥ 10) within 60 days before escalation and ≥ 1 post dose escalation PCDAI measurement, approximately 34% had clinically meaningful improvement (PCDAI improvement ≥ 10 points) after escalation (Figure 1), with 37% in remission at 12 mos after escalation. The numbers of pts/100 pt-years experiencing AEs, infections, and serious AEs were generally similar before/after escalation. Infusion reactions increased from 0.34% (1/294) of infusions within 3 mos before to 2.33% (13/558) within 3 mos after escalation. For 39 dose escalated pts in a PK/immunogenicity substudy, median trough IFX levels increased slightly from 1.18 μg/mL before to 3.21 μg/mL after escalation; 74% of pts with samples had antibodies to IFX (ATI) before (n=23, ≤ 1:3200; n=3, > 1:3200) and 76% after (n=20, ≤ 1:3200; n=2, > 1:3200) escalation. Conclusion: These real-world data reveal that many pts treated with IFX were positive for ATI before dose escalation and were dose escalated while in clinical remission. There appears to be some clinical benefit of IFX dose escalation in pediatric pts with CD that is evident 12 mos later, although of modest magnitude, with a slight increase in infusion reactions and little change in immunogenicity.Figure 1.: Distribution of Change in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) Scores for Crohn’s Disease Patients With Active Disease at Infliximab (IFX) Dose Escalation (N = 71). Change measured from last visit before escalation to first visit after escalation. Includes pts who received ≥ 1 escalated IFX dose of 10 mg/kg after ≥ 2 maintenance IFX doses of 5 mg/kg plus PCDAI score ≥ 10 within 60 days before escalation and ≥ 1 post dose escalation PCDAI measurement. Note: a decrease in PCDAI score represents an improvement of disease activity, whereas an increase in PCDAI score represents a worsening of disease activity.Table 1.: Proportions of Pediatric Patients in Clinical Response or Clinical Remission At and After Infliximab (IFX) Dose Escalation From 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».