136 Characterizing the medical and social complexity of Inuit children, youth, and their families from Nunavut who access care at an urban tertiary level paediatric hospital – A retrospective chart review of an Inuit child health clinic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Primary Subject area Social Paediatrics Background The Inuit Child Health Clinic is a consulting general pediatric outpatient clinic at an urban tertiary level paediatric designed to improve integration and coordination of care for Inuit children, youth, and their families from Nunavut. Characterizing medical and social complexity for this patient population will help to address existing gaps in health and social care, as well as contribute to the development of a culturally safe and sensitive determinants of health screening tool. Objectives To study and characterize the complexities that families cared for by the Inuit Child Health Clinic experience in navigating the health and community environments to identify gaps that exist within their care and understand how we can better support their unique needs. We define medical complexity similarly, referenced in existing literature as multi-system or multi-service involvement or prolonged stay in the city of the urban tertiary level paediatric hospital to access medical care. Design/Methods A retrospective chart review of patients (children and youth between the ages of 0-18 years old) and their caregivers that attended an outpatient general paediatric medicine clinic visit appointment with the Inuit Child Health Clinic between September 30, 2016, and September 30, 2019. A review of 59 patient charts were completed by 2 independent reviewers each for demographic information, medical complexity variables, and social complexity variables. This research has been approved by a local Research Ethics Board as well as the Nunavut Research Institute. Results There are high levels of medical and social complexity as evident through the high average number of healthcare services accessed, number of comorbidities, and number of admissions to hospital. We also found considerable inconsistencies with respect to documentation by providers on the social determinants of health of patients. Note: In collaboration with the Inuuqatigiit Centre for Inuit Children Youth and Families, Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and the Department of Health in Nunavut, the results and knowledge will be shared and mobilized to reflect a narrative that is community-driven and comments on any possible gaps in social determinants of health screening in clinical settings. Furthermore, in collaboration with the Qaujigiartiit Health Research Centre, this work will inform and support the broader program evaluation of the Inuit Child Health Clinic to meet the needs of patients, families, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach that focuses on integrative care may be an effective and efficient means to promote communication and collaboration between multiple service providers that are often involved in providing care to this population that is put at-risk due to systemic health and social inequities. Improving social history taking and integrating more formal screening for social determinants of health within the Inuit Child Health Clinic practice should be considered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».