The Pleasures and Dangers of Storytelling in Margaret Atwood's the Robber Bride
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In an undated note, found in Atwood collection at University of Toronto, Margaret Atwood queries source of following quotation or song lyric: Ask a woman where she's going and she'll tell you who she's been (Margaret Atwood Collection, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library. University of Toronto. 27:1). Atwood's interest in this line chimes with her frequent association between female identity and past selves; movement in this line from a progressive, hopeful (and, significantly, unrealised) geographical metaphor for selfhood and a role-playing, past-centred notion of selfhood is deeply resonant with what Atwood engages with in much of her fiction, particularly in Lady Oracle (1976), Cat's Eye (1988) and Robber Bride (1993). It is clear to see why this quotation would have struck a chord with Atwood as it illuminates a very Atwoodian strategy for writing a woman's life. As a prescription, it reflects power of play as a device in forging of female identities in Atwood's fiction, perhaps most noticeably in Robber Bride where character of Zenia's powers of story-telling privilege careful maintenance of simultaneous, creative identities over any cohesive subjectivity or linear trajectory of progress. In telling her life story over and over, Zenia alters her history to meet individual needs of other characters in novel--Charis, Roz, and Tony. narrative structure of novel is shaped around way in which Zenia mirrors each character's anxieties and confusion about their personal and cultural origins and fills in gaps in their individual life narratives. In telling stories that they want or need to hear, Zenia manipulates her way into other characters' life narratives. It is her role as an interloper--played so adeptly by Zenia--that renders her such a powerful and dangerous presence in novel. For example, Tony, who imagines herself to be a twin the other half of which had died (The Robber Bride. 1993, London: Virago, 1994: 137), comes to see Zenia as missing component in her life history, a partner in twinning suggested in Tony's ambidexterity: will be Zenia's right hand, because Zenia is certainly Tony's left one (169). But Zenia's supposed completion of Tony is not, as latter imagines it will be, a positive thing. Central to this interest in split or multiple selfhood and identity is a revisitation of Atwood's preoccupation with role of language and narrative in fashioning and preservation of identity. For Tony, is a synonym for narrative and she sounds a warning note about its inherent unreliability in opening pages: History is a construct, she tells her students. Any point of entry is possible and all choices are arbitrary (4). In Chapter 6, Tony concludes that, War is what happens when language fails (39), and later insists that Words are so often like window curtains, a decorative screen put up to keep neighbours at a distance (62). This can be read as a restatement of narrator's suspicion of dangers and vicissitudes of language in Atwood's earlier novel Surfacing (1972): Language divides us into fragments, I wanted to be whole (140). Similarly, fact that The story of Zenia is insubstantial, ownerless, a rumour only (461) is what ultimately makes Zenia so dangerous to other characters in novel. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».