MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W321052047

The Pleasures and Dangers of Storytelling in Margaret Atwood's the Robber Bride

2007· article· en· W321052047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ellen McWilliams

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes on Contemporary Literature · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityNarrativeMetaphorLiteratureIdentity (music)DramaHistoryArtAestheticsSociologyPhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an undated note, found in Atwood collection at University of Toronto, Margaret Atwood queries source of following quotation or song lyric: Ask a woman where she's going and she'll tell you who she's been (Margaret Atwood Collection, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library. University of Toronto. 27:1). Atwood's interest in this line chimes with her frequent association between female identity and past selves; movement in this line from a progressive, hopeful (and, significantly, unrealised) geographical metaphor for selfhood and a role-playing, past-centred notion of selfhood is deeply resonant with what Atwood engages with in much of her fiction, particularly in Lady Oracle (1976), Cat's Eye (1988) and Robber Bride (1993). It is clear to see why this quotation would have struck a chord with Atwood as it illuminates a very Atwoodian strategy for writing a woman's life. As a prescription, it reflects power of play as a device in forging of female identities in Atwood's fiction, perhaps most noticeably in Robber Bride where character of Zenia's powers of story-telling privilege careful maintenance of simultaneous, creative identities over any cohesive subjectivity or linear trajectory of progress. In telling her life story over and over, Zenia alters her history to meet individual needs of other characters in novel--Charis, Roz, and Tony. narrative structure of novel is shaped around way in which Zenia mirrors each character's anxieties and confusion about their personal and cultural origins and fills in gaps in their individual life narratives. In telling stories that they want or need to hear, Zenia manipulates her way into other characters' life narratives. It is her role as an interloper--played so adeptly by Zenia--that renders her such a powerful and dangerous presence in novel. For example, Tony, who imagines herself to be a twin the other half of which had died (The Robber Bride. 1993, London: Virago, 1994: 137), comes to see Zenia as missing component in her life history, a partner in twinning suggested in Tony's ambidexterity: will be Zenia's right hand, because Zenia is certainly Tony's left one (169). But Zenia's supposed completion of Tony is not, as latter imagines it will be, a positive thing. Central to this interest in split or multiple selfhood and identity is a revisitation of Atwood's preoccupation with role of language and narrative in fashioning and preservation of identity. For Tony, is a synonym for narrative and she sounds a warning note about its inherent unreliability in opening pages: History is a construct, she tells her students. Any point of entry is possible and all choices are arbitrary (4). In Chapter 6, Tony concludes that, War is what happens when language fails (39), and later insists that Words are so often like window curtains, a decorative screen put up to keep neighbours at a distance (62). This can be read as a restatement of narrator's suspicion of dangers and vicissitudes of language in Atwood's earlier novel Surfacing (1972): Language divides us into fragments, I wanted to be whole (140). Similarly, fact that The story of Zenia is insubstantial, ownerless, a rumour only (461) is what ultimately makes Zenia so dangerous to other characters in novel. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotes on Contemporary LiteratureSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207