Annotated catalogue of the Tachinidae (Insecta, Diptera) of Chile
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Tachinidae (Diptera) of Chile are catalogued and information is given on distributions, name-bearing types, synonyms, nomenclatural issues, and pertinent literature. The history of tachinid collectors in Chile and authors who have contributed to the systematic knowledge of Chilean tachinids is extensively reviewed. The classification has been updated and 122 genera and 264 species are recognised in Chile. There is a significant amount of endemism with 28 genera and 100 species known only from Chile. There are also 113 species with distributions shared only between Chile and Argentina, particularly in the southern portions of these countries comprising Patagonia. The catalogue is based on examination of the original descriptions of all nominal species and all other references known to us containing relevant taxonomic and distributional information, for a total of approximately 450 references. Many of the name-bearing types and other Chilean specimens housed in collections were examined. Taxa are arranged hierarchically and alphabetically under the categories of subfamily, tribe, genus, subgenus (where recognised), and species. Nomenclatural information is provided for genus-group and species-group names, including lists of synonyms (mostly restricted to Neotropical taxa) and name-bearing type data. Species distributions are recorded by country within the New World and by larger geographical divisions in the Old World. Additional information is given in the form of notes and references under valid names at the level of tribe, genus, and species. Two genera are newly recorded from Chile:ChaetoepalpusVimmer & Soukup, 1940 (Tachinini) (also newly recorded from Argentina) andPatelloaTownsend, 1916 (Goniini). Four species are newly recorded from Chile or other countries:Lypha ornataAldrich, 1934 (Chile);Chaetoepalpus coquilletiVimmer & Soukup, 1940 (Argentina and Chile);Phytomyptera evanescens(Cortés, 1967) (Argentina); andXanthobasis unicolorAldrich, 1934 (Chile). Eight species previously recorded from Chile are deemed to have been misidentified or misrecorded from Chile (known distributions in parentheses):Archytas incertus(Macquart, 1851) (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay);Archytas seminiger(Wiedemann, 1830) (Brazil, Colombia);Gonia crassicornis(Fabricius, 1794) (Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, Middle America, West Indies, Nearctic);Lespesia andina(Bigot, 1888) (Cuba);Lespesia archippivora(Riley, 1871) (widespread Nearctic and most of Neotropical);Neoethilla ignobilis(van der Wulp, 1890) (Mexico, United States); Siphona (Siphona) geniculata (De Geer, 1776) (Palaearctic, Nearctic [introduced]); andWinthemia quadripustulata(Fabricius, 1794) (Palaearctic, Nearctic, Oriental]. As First Reviser we fixParatheresia rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 as the senior homonym andSarcoprosena rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 as the junior homonym when the two are placed together inBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830; and we fixMayophorinia angustaTownsend, 1927 as the senior homonym andMetarrhinomyia angustaTownsend, 1927 as the junior homonym when the two are placed together inMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889. New replacement names are proposed for eight preoccupied names of Neotropical species (country of type locality in parentheses):Billaea rufescensO’Hara & Wood forSarcoprosena rufiventrisTownsend, 1929, preoccupied in the genusBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830 byParatheresia rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 (Peru),nom. nov.;Billaea triquetrusO’Hara & Wood forSarcoprosena trianguliferaTownsend, 1927, preoccupied in the genusBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830 byDexia trianguliferaZetterstedt, 1844 (Peru),nom. nov.;Eucelatoria nudioculataO’Hara & Wood forEucelatorioidea nigripalpisThompson, 1968, preoccupied in the genusEucelatoriaTownsend, 1909 byChetolyga nigripalpisBigot, 1889 (Trinidad),nom. nov.;Eucelatoria oblongaO’Hara & Wood forUrodexodes elongatumCortés & Campos, 1974, preoccupied in the genusEucelatoriaTownsend, 1909 byExorista elongatavan der Wulp, 1890 (Chile),nom. nov.;Lespesia thompsoniO’Hara & Wood forSturmiopsoidea obscuraThompson, 1966, preoccupied in the genusLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 byEurigaster obscurusBigot, 1857 (Cuba),nom. nov.;Myiopharus charapensisO’Hara & Wood forMetarrhinomyia angustaTownsend, 1927, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byMayophorinia angustaTownsend, 1927 (Peru),nom. nov.;Myiopharus incognitusO’Hara & Wood forStenochaeta claripalpisThompson, 1968, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byNeoxynopsoidea claripalpisThompson, 1968 (Trinidad),nom. nov.; andMyiopharus rufopalpusO’Hara & Wood forParalispe palpalisTownsend, 1929, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byMyioxynops palpalisTownsend, 1927 (Peru),nom. nov.New type species fixations are made under the provisions of Article 70.3.2 of the ICZNCodefor three genus-group names:ParafabriciaBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1894 (synonym ofArchytasJaennicke, 1867), type species newly fixed asParafabricia perplexaTownsend, 1931;TachinodesBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 (synonym ofArchytasJaennicke, 1867), type species newly fixed asJurinia metallicaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830; andWillistoniaBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 (synonym ofBelvosiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830), type species newly fixed asWillistonia aldrichiTownsend, 1931. Lectotypes are designated for the following four nominal species, all described or possibly described from Chile:Echinomyia pygmaeaMacquart, 1851 (a valid name in the genusPeleteriaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830);Gonia chilensisMacquart, 1844 (a junior synonym ofGonia pallensWiedemann, 1830);Masicera auricepsMacquart, 1844 (a valid name in the genusLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863); andProsopochoeta nitidiventrisMacquart, 1851 (a valid name in the genusProsopochaetaMacquart, 1851). The following 27 new or revived combinations are proposed (distributions in parentheses):Blepharipeza andinaBigot, 1888 is moved toLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 asL. andina,nomen dubium(Cuba),comb. nov.;Camposodes evanescensCortés, 1967 is moved toPhytomypteraRondani, 1845 asP. evanescens(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Ectophasiopsis ypirangaDios & Nihei, 2017 is moved to Trichopoda Berthold, 1827 and assigned to subgenus Galactomyia Townsend, 1908 as T. (G.) ypiranga (Argentina, Brazil),comb. nov.;Embiomyia australisAldrich, 1934 is moved toSteleoneuraStein, 1924 asS. australis(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Eurigaster modestusBigot, 1857 is moved toLespesiaasL. modesta(Cuba),comb. nov.;Eurigaster obscurusBigot, 1857 is moved toLespesiaasL. obscura(Cuba),comb. nov.;Macropatelloa tanumeanaTownsend, 1931 is moved toPatelloaTownsend, 1916 asP. tanumeana(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Masicera insignisvan der Wulp, 1882 is moved toDrinoRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 asD. insignis(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Parasetigena hichinsiCortés, 1967 is moved toChetogenaRondani, 1856 asC. hichinsi
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,012 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,082 | 0,029 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».