MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211080018 · doi:10.3897/zookeys.1064.62972

Annotated catalogue of the Tachinidae (Insecta, Diptera) of Chile

2021· article· en· W3211080018 on OpenAlexafffund
James E. O’Hara, David M. Wood, Christian R. González

Bibliographic record

VenueZooKeys · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersDivision of Environmental BiologyAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleSapienza Università di RomaUniversidade de São PauloStrongNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTachinidaeSubgenusTaxonGenusZoologyGeographyTribeTaxonomic rankType (biology)NomenclatureSubfamilyBiologyEcologyTaxonomy (biology)Anthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tachinidae (Diptera) of Chile are catalogued and information is given on distributions, name-bearing types, synonyms, nomenclatural issues, and pertinent literature. The history of tachinid collectors in Chile and authors who have contributed to the systematic knowledge of Chilean tachinids is extensively reviewed. The classification has been updated and 122 genera and 264 species are recognised in Chile. There is a significant amount of endemism with 28 genera and 100 species known only from Chile. There are also 113 species with distributions shared only between Chile and Argentina, particularly in the southern portions of these countries comprising Patagonia. The catalogue is based on examination of the original descriptions of all nominal species and all other references known to us containing relevant taxonomic and distributional information, for a total of approximately 450 references. Many of the name-bearing types and other Chilean specimens housed in collections were examined. Taxa are arranged hierarchically and alphabetically under the categories of subfamily, tribe, genus, subgenus (where recognised), and species. Nomenclatural information is provided for genus-group and species-group names, including lists of synonyms (mostly restricted to Neotropical taxa) and name-bearing type data. Species distributions are recorded by country within the New World and by larger geographical divisions in the Old World. Additional information is given in the form of notes and references under valid names at the level of tribe, genus, and species. Two genera are newly recorded from Chile:ChaetoepalpusVimmer & Soukup, 1940 (Tachinini) (also newly recorded from Argentina) andPatelloaTownsend, 1916 (Goniini). Four species are newly recorded from Chile or other countries:Lypha ornataAldrich, 1934 (Chile);Chaetoepalpus coquilletiVimmer & Soukup, 1940 (Argentina and Chile);Phytomyptera evanescens(Cortés, 1967) (Argentina); andXanthobasis unicolorAldrich, 1934 (Chile). Eight species previously recorded from Chile are deemed to have been misidentified or misrecorded from Chile (known distributions in parentheses):Archytas incertus(Macquart, 1851) (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay);Archytas seminiger(Wiedemann, 1830) (Brazil, Colombia);Gonia crassicornis(Fabricius, 1794) (Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, Middle America, West Indies, Nearctic);Lespesia andina(Bigot, 1888) (Cuba);Lespesia archippivora(Riley, 1871) (widespread Nearctic and most of Neotropical);Neoethilla ignobilis(van der Wulp, 1890) (Mexico, United States); Siphona (Siphona) geniculata (De Geer, 1776) (Palaearctic, Nearctic [introduced]); andWinthemia quadripustulata(Fabricius, 1794) (Palaearctic, Nearctic, Oriental]. As First Reviser we fixParatheresia rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 as the senior homonym andSarcoprosena rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 as the junior homonym when the two are placed together inBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830; and we fixMayophorinia angustaTownsend, 1927 as the senior homonym andMetarrhinomyia angustaTownsend, 1927 as the junior homonym when the two are placed together inMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889. New replacement names are proposed for eight preoccupied names of Neotropical species (country of type locality in parentheses):Billaea rufescensO’Hara & Wood forSarcoprosena rufiventrisTownsend, 1929, preoccupied in the genusBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830 byParatheresia rufiventrisTownsend, 1929 (Peru),nom. nov.;Billaea triquetrusO’Hara & Wood forSarcoprosena trianguliferaTownsend, 1927, preoccupied in the genusBillaeaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830 byDexia trianguliferaZetterstedt, 1844 (Peru),nom. nov.;Eucelatoria nudioculataO’Hara & Wood forEucelatorioidea nigripalpisThompson, 1968, preoccupied in the genusEucelatoriaTownsend, 1909 byChetolyga nigripalpisBigot, 1889 (Trinidad),nom. nov.;Eucelatoria oblongaO’Hara & Wood forUrodexodes elongatumCortés & Campos, 1974, preoccupied in the genusEucelatoriaTownsend, 1909 byExorista elongatavan der Wulp, 1890 (Chile),nom. nov.;Lespesia thompsoniO’Hara & Wood forSturmiopsoidea obscuraThompson, 1966, preoccupied in the genusLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 byEurigaster obscurusBigot, 1857 (Cuba),nom. nov.;Myiopharus charapensisO’Hara & Wood forMetarrhinomyia angustaTownsend, 1927, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byMayophorinia angustaTownsend, 1927 (Peru),nom. nov.;Myiopharus incognitusO’Hara & Wood forStenochaeta claripalpisThompson, 1968, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byNeoxynopsoidea claripalpisThompson, 1968 (Trinidad),nom. nov.; andMyiopharus rufopalpusO’Hara & Wood forParalispe palpalisTownsend, 1929, preoccupied in the genusMyiopharusBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 byMyioxynops palpalisTownsend, 1927 (Peru),nom. nov.New type species fixations are made under the provisions of Article 70.3.2 of the ICZNCodefor three genus-group names:ParafabriciaBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1894 (synonym ofArchytasJaennicke, 1867), type species newly fixed asParafabricia perplexaTownsend, 1931;TachinodesBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 (synonym ofArchytasJaennicke, 1867), type species newly fixed asJurinia metallicaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830; andWillistoniaBrauer & Bergenstamm, 1889 (synonym ofBelvosiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830), type species newly fixed asWillistonia aldrichiTownsend, 1931. Lectotypes are designated for the following four nominal species, all described or possibly described from Chile:Echinomyia pygmaeaMacquart, 1851 (a valid name in the genusPeleteriaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1830);Gonia chilensisMacquart, 1844 (a junior synonym ofGonia pallensWiedemann, 1830);Masicera auricepsMacquart, 1844 (a valid name in the genusLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863); andProsopochoeta nitidiventrisMacquart, 1851 (a valid name in the genusProsopochaetaMacquart, 1851). The following 27 new or revived combinations are proposed (distributions in parentheses):Blepharipeza andinaBigot, 1888 is moved toLespesiaRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 asL. andina,nomen dubium(Cuba),comb. nov.;Camposodes evanescensCortés, 1967 is moved toPhytomypteraRondani, 1845 asP. evanescens(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Ectophasiopsis ypirangaDios & Nihei, 2017 is moved to Trichopoda Berthold, 1827 and assigned to subgenus Galactomyia Townsend, 1908 as T. (G.) ypiranga (Argentina, Brazil),comb. nov.;Embiomyia australisAldrich, 1934 is moved toSteleoneuraStein, 1924 asS. australis(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Eurigaster modestusBigot, 1857 is moved toLespesiaasL. modesta(Cuba),comb. nov.;Eurigaster obscurusBigot, 1857 is moved toLespesiaasL. obscura(Cuba),comb. nov.;Macropatelloa tanumeanaTownsend, 1931 is moved toPatelloaTownsend, 1916 asP. tanumeana(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Masicera insignisvan der Wulp, 1882 is moved toDrinoRobineau-Desvoidy, 1863 asD. insignis(Argentina, Chile),comb. nov.;Parasetigena hichinsiCortés, 1967 is moved toChetogenaRondani, 1856 asC. hichinsi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZooKeysSame topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207