Architecture in a contested territory: co-creating a community hub with the people of Jane and Finch, Toronto
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The population of the City of Toronto vastly increased due to a significant migration of people from all over the world to seek a better life after World War II. Many settled into ethnic enclaves that share similar cultures and characteristics. Since the 1970s, Toronto has grown into a large city much like Paris and London, where low-income families, which are mostly minorities, are pushed into the urban periphery. One of these inner-city neighbourhoods, Jane and Finch, is composed of two city neighbourhoods: Black Creek (Up Top, to the North) and Glenfield-Jane Heights (Down Bottom, to the South). Jane and Finch is a major intersection known for its high rates of gang violence such as shootings, drugs, robberies, and other gang-related activities. The negative reputation of Jane and Finch is further spread by the media, promulgating racial stereotypes about the neighbourhood. The rapid growth of the community in the 1960s to 1970s resulted in overcrowding in schools and insufficient recreational facilities, which caused additional stress for the residents. The gang rivalry over territory in Jane and Finch created an invisible barrier at the intersection: The Up Top and Down Bottom. Adding to the gang violence, the lack of city funding and general neglect transformed Jane and Finch into a community with the highest level of inequality amongst the neighbourhoods within the Greater Toronto Area. Jane and Finch was not always like this, but it is difficult for people to see past its bad reputation. As a member of the community, I know of many positive aspects overlooked by outsiders. However, the reputation is slowly changing. Nowadays, Jane and Finch receives recognition for the art which the residents have created. I believe that the image of the community can be altered as long as people can learn about the positive stories of the residents. This thesis looks at opportunities to co-create a community center for the people of Jane and Finch, with the use of community engagement as a process to work collectively with community members. The outcome is a building with a breadth of spaces and programs that is available to a diverse group of community users. The Jane and Finch Community Hub contains a youth lounge, daycare, art studio, music studio, dance studio, market space, communal kitchen, cafe, community training spaces and a pool.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,059 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,013 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».