DREAMM-5 Study: Investigating the Synergetic Effects of Belantamab Mafodotin Plus Inducible T-Cell Co-Stimulator Agonist (aICOS) Combination Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Single-agent belantamab mafodotin (belamaf), a B-cell maturation antigen-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, achieved durable responses with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the Phase 2 DREAMM-2 trial (NCT03525678). The DREAMM-5 platform trial (208887; NCT04126200) is evaluating belamaf as combination therapy with other anticancer agents to determine if belamaf's unique multimodal mechanism of action (MoA) is synergistic with MoAs of selected agents to further augment efficacy in RRMM. In this substudy, belamaf is combined with feladilimab (GSK3359609), an inducible co-stimulatory T-cell molecule (ICOS, CD278) agonist (aICOS). Methods: DREAMM-5 is an ongoing Phase 1/2 platform trial. Each platform substudy consists of a dose-exploration (DE) phase to identify effective belamaf combinations followed by a cohort-expansion (CE) phase to compare the combination with a shared single-agent belamaf control arm. The primary and secondary objectives of the DE phase are to determine the safety/tolerability and preliminary efficacy, respectively, of the combination therapy as well as to establish the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the CE phase based on these data. A preliminary analysis of safety, pharmacokinetic, biomarker, and efficacy data performed at the end of the DE phase will determine if it should move forward to the CE phase. This is a preliminary analysis of data from patients in the DE phase of the DREAMM-5 belantamab mafodotin and aICOS substudy. Patients are assigned to one of 3 belamaf + aICOS DE cohorts by a predetermined algorithm (N≤10 per cohort): belamaf (1.9 mg/kg or 2.5 mg/kg) + aICOS (8 mg) or belamaf (2.5 mg/kg) plus aICOS (24 mg). In cohort A, the starting dose of belamaf (1.9 mg/kg) and aICOS (8 mg) is administered to 3 patients, starting with a sentinel patient and expanding to the second and third patient consecutively over the course of at least 10 days. Cohort B (belamaf 2.5 mg/kg and aICOS 8 mg) and cohort C (belamaf 2.5 mg/kg and aICOS 24 mg) are only evaluated after the lower doses for each treatment clear the dose-limiting criteria for the first 3 patients. Results: A total of 23 patients treated with belamaf + aICOS were included in this preliminary analysis. The median (range) of prior lines of therapy was 5 (3-10). The majority of patients (21 [91%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 and the remainder (2 [9%]) had an ECOG PS of 2. Thirty percent of patients (n=7) had high-risk cytogenetics, and no patients had extramedullary disease. The preliminary overall clinical response rate for the total population was 48% (n=11; 95% CI: 26.8-69.4), with 26% of patients (n=6) achieving a very good partial response or better (Table). Nineteen patients (83%) of the total population experienced an adverse event (AE) related to study treatment and 12 patients (52%) experienced Grade ≥3 AEs related to study treatment. A total of 16 patients (70%) in the total population experienced any grade ocular AEs while 9 patients (39%) had Grade ≥3 ocular AEs related to study treatment. Only 2 patients (1 each from cohorts A and B) permanently discontinued study treatment due to AEs. Dose reductions and delays were used to manage AEs in several patients (Table). Conclusion: In this preliminary analysis, belamaf combined with aICOS showed encouraging clinical activity along with a safety profile that was manageable through dose modifications in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of belamaf + aICOS combination therapy as well as establishing the RP2D for the CE phase is ongoing in this substudy. Funding: GSK (Study 208887); belamaf drug linker technology licensed from Seagen; belamaf monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ribrag: Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Richardson: Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nooka: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive technologies: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Song: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Minnema: BMS: Honoraria; Jansen-Cilag: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Hospitality. Weisel: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Quach: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen/Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ballas: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ratia: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kaisermann: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Holkova: GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trudel: Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Amgen Canada: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».