Degradation of Red Blood Cell Deformability during Cold Storage in Blood Bags
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract RBC transfusions are a life-saving procedure, aiding both chronic and acute patients in restoring tissue oxygenation. The ability to store collected RBC units for prolonged periods has been one of the most transformative advances in medicine, significantly improving the reliability and the speed of access to blood. However, RBCs undergo a number of metabolic, structural, and biochemical changes during storage, collectively known as the storage lesion, that is detrimental to the quality of the RBC. A major challenge is the ability to evaluate the extent of the storage lesion, and thus the quality of the stored RBC unit directly prior to transfusion. The storage lesion can directly or indirectly reduce the ability of the RBC to deform through the small openings in the microvasculature. Rigid RBCs pose a risk of sequestration in capillaries, impeding blood flow and reducing tissue oxygenation, and are more likely to be cleared out by endothelial macrophages. Studies have shown that there is a loss in RBC deformability during storage and that the rate of RBC deformability loss is donor-dependent. Thus, RBC deformability can be a valuable and reliable biophysical marker of RBC unit quality. Currently, there is a need for a reliable measurement technique that is repeatable and sensitive enough to observe individual differences in RBC deformability in healthy donors, to enable quality control testing of RBC units. We have developed the microfluidic ratchet device, which sorts RBCs based on their deformability, allowing the measurement of both rigid and deformable sup-populations of RBCs within the sample, and generating a unique deformability curve. Here, we use this assay to predict the quality of stored RBC units. We assessed the deformability of 14 healthy donor RBC units through 8 weeks of cold storage at 4°C, which is 2 weeks beyond the Canadian Blood Services approved 6-week standard in Canada. We measured RBC deformability, standard hematological parameters (MCV, MCHC, MCH, and RDW), and hemolysis levels at the time of RBC unit manufacture (week 0), followed by weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. The microfluidic ratchet device operates by forcing RBCs to deform and travel through rows of tapered constrictions. Constriction size changes from 7.5 to 1.5 µm and is reflective of the microvasculature and vessel opening sizes encountered by RBCs in circulation. RBCs are sorted into 12 distinct outlets based on their deformability. Distribution of RBCs in outlets 1-12 can be quantified and used to calculate the cumulative distribution curve. The cumulative distribution curve provides a distinct deformability signature of each individual RBC sample, which can be defined as rigidity score (RS). RS provides an easy metric to compare the changes in RBC deformability throughout storage (ΔRS) in a single donor as well as across multiple donors. We show that there are both donor- and sex-specific differences in the RBC deformability signatures of stored RBC units. We observed significant inter-donor variability in RBC deformability measured on the day of the RBC unit manufacture, where male donors showed a more stable RBC deformability range (n=8, RS=3.00±0.18) compared to female donors (n=6, RS= 3.29±0.48). The average RS scores were stable between weeks 0-2 (ΔRS 0.07) and showed a reduction in deformability between weeks 1-6 (ΔRS 0.35), with the greatest loss seen between weeks 6-8 (ΔRS 0.42) of cold storage. Interestingly, the response to cold storage is variable, with ΔRS 0.22 to 0.90, suggesting that some donors are more susceptible to storage related changes in RBC deformability than others. Notably, the change in RS over time was donor-specific and did not correlate with RBC deformability at week 0. The majority of RBCs from male donors (ΔRS 0.485, p<0.05), but none of the female donors (ΔRS 0.172) showed changes in deformability during cold storage, suggesting that RBCs from female donors degrade at a slower rate compared to RBCs from male donors. The ability to profile RBC deformability at the individual blood bag level may help identify more stable RBCs for use in chronic and sensitive patients, or RBC units that can be safely stored beyond the 6-week storage window. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».