Degradation of Red Blood Cell Deformability during Cold Storage in Blood Bags
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract RBC transfusions are a life-saving procedure, aiding both chronic and acute patients in restoring tissue oxygenation. The ability to store collected RBC units for prolonged periods has been one of the most transformative advances in medicine, significantly improving the reliability and the speed of access to blood. However, RBCs undergo a number of metabolic, structural, and biochemical changes during storage, collectively known as the storage lesion, that is detrimental to the quality of the RBC. A major challenge is the ability to evaluate the extent of the storage lesion, and thus the quality of the stored RBC unit directly prior to transfusion. The storage lesion can directly or indirectly reduce the ability of the RBC to deform through the small openings in the microvasculature. Rigid RBCs pose a risk of sequestration in capillaries, impeding blood flow and reducing tissue oxygenation, and are more likely to be cleared out by endothelial macrophages. Studies have shown that there is a loss in RBC deformability during storage and that the rate of RBC deformability loss is donor-dependent. Thus, RBC deformability can be a valuable and reliable biophysical marker of RBC unit quality. Currently, there is a need for a reliable measurement technique that is repeatable and sensitive enough to observe individual differences in RBC deformability in healthy donors, to enable quality control testing of RBC units. We have developed the microfluidic ratchet device, which sorts RBCs based on their deformability, allowing the measurement of both rigid and deformable sup-populations of RBCs within the sample, and generating a unique deformability curve. Here, we use this assay to predict the quality of stored RBC units. We assessed the deformability of 14 healthy donor RBC units through 8 weeks of cold storage at 4°C, which is 2 weeks beyond the Canadian Blood Services approved 6-week standard in Canada. We measured RBC deformability, standard hematological parameters (MCV, MCHC, MCH, and RDW), and hemolysis levels at the time of RBC unit manufacture (week 0), followed by weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. The microfluidic ratchet device operates by forcing RBCs to deform and travel through rows of tapered constrictions. Constriction size changes from 7.5 to 1.5 µm and is reflective of the microvasculature and vessel opening sizes encountered by RBCs in circulation. RBCs are sorted into 12 distinct outlets based on their deformability. Distribution of RBCs in outlets 1-12 can be quantified and used to calculate the cumulative distribution curve. The cumulative distribution curve provides a distinct deformability signature of each individual RBC sample, which can be defined as rigidity score (RS). RS provides an easy metric to compare the changes in RBC deformability throughout storage (ΔRS) in a single donor as well as across multiple donors. We show that there are both donor- and sex-specific differences in the RBC deformability signatures of stored RBC units. We observed significant inter-donor variability in RBC deformability measured on the day of the RBC unit manufacture, where male donors showed a more stable RBC deformability range (n=8, RS=3.00±0.18) compared to female donors (n=6, RS= 3.29±0.48). The average RS scores were stable between weeks 0-2 (ΔRS 0.07) and showed a reduction in deformability between weeks 1-6 (ΔRS 0.35), with the greatest loss seen between weeks 6-8 (ΔRS 0.42) of cold storage. Interestingly, the response to cold storage is variable, with ΔRS 0.22 to 0.90, suggesting that some donors are more susceptible to storage related changes in RBC deformability than others. Notably, the change in RS over time was donor-specific and did not correlate with RBC deformability at week 0. The majority of RBCs from male donors (ΔRS 0.485, p<0.05), but none of the female donors (ΔRS 0.172) showed changes in deformability during cold storage, suggesting that RBCs from female donors degrade at a slower rate compared to RBCs from male donors. The ability to profile RBC deformability at the individual blood bag level may help identify more stable RBCs for use in chronic and sensitive patients, or RBC units that can be safely stored beyond the 6-week storage window. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".