Dabrafenib, Alone or in Combination with Trametinib, in Pediatric Patients with <i>BRAF</i> V600 Mutation-Positive Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare proliferative disorder associated with varied clinical presentations. Patients (pts) with advanced disease have frequent recurrences despite standard chemotherapy and a significant proportion experience long-term complications, including orthopaedic, endocrine, auditory, or neurodegenerative complications. BRAF V600 mutations have been reported in over 50% of LCH cases. The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib is approved for BRAF V600-mutation positive melanoma, NSCLC, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. Here we describe the pooled analysis of pts with LCH from two open-label phase I/II studies in pediatric pts with recurrent/refractory malignancies, treated with dabrafenib monotherapy (CDRB436A2102; NCT01677741) or dabrafenib plus trametinib (CTMT212X2101; NCT02124772). Results: At the data cut-off date of January 19, 2021, 13 pts with LCH had received dabrafenib monotherapy (n=2, escalation; n=11, expansion). Median age was 3 years (range, 1-11) and all pts had received prior chemotherapy (100%); one patient received prior immunoglobulin and prior anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody (8%). Median duration of exposure to dabrafenib was 51 months (range, 7-65); 7 pts continued treatment on a rollover study and 6 discontinued, due to adverse events (AE; n=2), investigator decision (n=3), or switch to combination therapy via compassionate use (n=1). All pts experienced AEs, regardless of relationship to treatment; 11 pts (85%) had grade ≥3 AEs. All pts experienced AEs, suspected to be related to treatment, most commonly vomiting (46%), increased creatinine (38%), dry skin, rash, and melanocytic naevus (each 30%). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 2 pts (increased blood creatinine; Epstein-Barr virus associated lymphoma, not related to treatment); there were no on-treatment deaths. The overall response rate (ORR) was 77% (6 complete response [CR]; 4 regressive disease [RD]); median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR), the estimated 24-month DOR rate was 90% (95% CI, 40-100). Median PFS was NR; the estimated 24-month PFS rate was 90% (95% CI, 50-100). At the data cut-off date of February 10, 2021, 12 pts with LCH had received dabrafenib + trametinib combination (2, escalation; 10, expansion). Median age was 4 years (range, 2-13) and all pts had received prior chemotherapy (100%). Median duration of exposure to treatment was 22 months (range 1.8-35.9); 8 patients continued therapy on a rollover study and 4 discontinued, due to AEs (n=2), lack of efficacy (n=1), or long term CR (n=1). All pts experienced AEs; 9 pts (75%) had grade ≥3 AEs. All pts experienced AEs, suspected to be related to treatment, most commonly pyrexia (58%), diarrhoea, dry skin, decreased neutrophil count, and vomiting (each 42%). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 2 pts (AST increased; ALT increased); there were no on-treatment deaths. The ORR was 58% (4 CR; 3 RD); median DOR was NR, the estimated 24-month DOR rate was 100% (95% CI, NR-NR). Median PFS was NR; the estimated 24-month PFS rate was 100% (95% CI, NR-NR). Conclusions: Dabrafenib, with or without trametinib, demonstrated durable efficacy in pediatric pts with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600E mutation-positive LCH, with 90-100% of responses ongoing at 24 months. Treatment was associated with acceptable tolerability and manageable toxicities; the safety profile was consistent with what has been seen in other pediatric indications and in adult studies. Disclosures Whitlock: Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Roughton: Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment. Choi: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Osterloh: Novartis Farmacéutica S.A. Spain: Current Employment. Russo: Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Hargrave: AstraZeneca; Bayer; DayOne; Janssen; Novartis; Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; AstraZeneca; Bayer; Novartis; Roche: Honoraria; Bayer: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Trametinib in combination with dabrafenib is approved for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations; adjuvant treatment for melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations; metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with BRAF V600E mutation; locally advanced/metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer with BRAF V600E mutation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».