MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3211790423 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-144905

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in Combination with Azacitidine Induces Durable Complete Remissions in Patients with mIDH1 Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2021· article· en· W3211790423 sur OpenAlexaff
Jörge E. Cortes, Jordi Esteve, Ashish Bajel, Karen Yee, Thorsten Braun, Stéphane de Botton, Pierre Péterlin, Christian Récher, Xavier Thomas, Justin M. Watts, Montserrat Arnán Sangerman, Antonio Curti, Carolyn Grove, Brian A. Jonas, Francesco Lanza, Olivier Legrand, Pau Montesinos, Prapti A. Patel, Thomas Prébet, Eunice S. Wang, Olga Polyanskaya, Julie Brevard, Jennifer Sweeney, Pierre Fenaux, Andrew H. Wei

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaAzacitidineGastroenterologyHypomethylating agentRefractory (planetary science)MyeloidVenetoclaxLeukemiaAcute leukemiaOncologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Olutasidenib, a potent, selective, oral, small molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1), has been previously shown, as a single agent, to be well tolerated and induce durable complete remissions in a subset of patients (pts) with high-risk relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% and a CR/CRh rate of 33% (de Botton et al., ASCO/EHA 2021). Azacitidine (AZA) has shown synergistic effects with mIDH1 inhibitors on releasing differentiation block in mIDH leukemia models in vitro. Here, we present results of an ongoing phase 2 trial (NCT02719574) in pts receiving olutasidenib (150 mg twice daily) in combination with AZA (75 mg/m 2) (Olu-AZA). Methods: Pts were enrolled into 1 of 4 Olu-AZA cohorts: (1) pts with R/R AML/MDS who were naïve to prior hypomethylating agent [HMA] and IDH1 inhibitor therapy, (2) pts with R/R AML/MDS who had inadequately responded to or had progressed on prior HMA, (3) pts with R/R AML/MDS who were previously treated with an IDH1 inhibitor as their last therapy prior to enrollment (including pts who received single-agent olutasidenib), and (4) treatment naïve [TN] mIDH1 AML pts who were candidates for AZA first line treatment. The primary endpoint was CR/CRh (complete remission [CR] according to modified IWG 2003 criteria plus CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]) response rate. CRh was defined as bone marrow blasts < 5%, absolute neutrophil count > 0.5×10 9/L, and platelet count > 50×10 9/L. ORR, a secondary endpoint, comprised CR+CRh+CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) + partial remission (PR). Duration of treatment (DOT) time to response, and duration of response were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Due to the low number of MDS pts, response parameters are presented for AML pts only. Results: As of 16-June-2021, a total of 72 pts with AML/MDS (n=63/9) received Olu-AZA (R/R w/o prior HMA/IDH1 therapy, n=20; R/R with prior HMA therapy, n=21; R/R with prior IDH1 therapy, n=20; TN AML, n=11) with a median DOT of 4.7 mo (95% CI: 3.6, 5.7). The median age was 72 y (range: 28‒84) with a median number of prior therapies for R/R pts of 2 (1‒5). At the cut-off, 11 (15%) pts remained on treatment and 61 (85%) had discontinued, most commonly (≥10%) due to: disease progression (32%), transplant (11%), and AEs (10%). For pts with AML, the ORR across Olu-AZA cohorts was 40-68% with a median duration of ORR of 3.7-8.5 mo (not reached [NR] for TN AML) and a median time to first response (PR or better) of 1.6-2.8 mo (Table 1). Notably, the CR/CRh rate ranged from 30-47% including 23-45% of pts in CR, with a median duration of CR/CRh of 4.7-16.0 mo (NR for TN AML) and a median time to CR/CRh of 2.8-4.0 mo. For pts who were transfusion-dependent at baseline, 56-day transfusion independence was achieved by 40-100% of pts for platelets and 25-57% of pts for red blood cells (Table 1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥25% of pts were nausea (49%), constipation (40%), vomiting (35%), thrombocytopenia (32%), diarrhea (28%), and neutropenia (26%). Grade 3/4 all-causality TEAEs in >10% of pts were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (25%), anemia (19%), and febrile neutropenia (14%). TEAEs of QTc prolongation (all grades) were reported in 5 (7%) pts with grade 3 events in 2 (3%) pts. All pts were receiving concomitant medications associated with QTc prolongation. No events led to olutasidenib dose reduction or discontinuation. Hepatobiliary TEAEs associated with liver enzyme abnormalities (all grades) were reported in 15 (21%) pts, with grade ≥3 events in 6 (8%) pts. Most pts (n=11) required no dose modification or were successfully rechallenged, 3 pts with grade ≥3 events discontinued treatment, two after recurrence of abnormalities with rechallenge, and one pt died with liver function tests abnormal in the setting of AML progression and sepsis. There were no cases of Hy's law. Investigator-assessed IDH1 differentiation syndrome (any grade) was observed in 6 (8%) pts; most cases resolved with treatment interruption, dexamethasone, and/or supportive treatment; 2 pts had concomitant leukocytosis. Conclusions: Olutasidenib in combination with AZA was well tolerated and induced durable CR/CRh in a subset of high-risk pts with mIDH1 AML. Transfusion independence was achieved in a subset of pts in all cohorts. Additional analyses of safety and efficacy will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cortes: Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Esteve: Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Bajel: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria. Yee: Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Paladin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braun: Servier: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. De Botton: Celgene, Agios, Forma Therapeutics, Astella, Daiichi Sankyo, Syros, Abbvie, Bayer, Seattle Genetics, Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene, Agios, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Syros, Abbvie, Bayer, Janssen, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Agios, Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding. Recher: Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MaatPharma: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Watts: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutices: Research Funding. Curti: Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grove: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jonas: 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement. Montesinos: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entit

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207