MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3212046139 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-152750

Safety and Efficacy of Lower Intensity Induction Therapy with Intravenous Prexigebersen (BP1001) in Patients with High-Risk and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

2021· article· en· W3212046139 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maro Ohanian, Tara L. Lin, Ellen K. Ritchie, Michael Craig, Apurv Agrawal, Kathleen G. Halka, Naveen Pemmaraju, Gautam Borthakur, Miranda Lim, Sherry Pierce, Ana Tari Ashizawa, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Jörge E. Cortes, Gail J. Roboz

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefractory (planetary science)MedicineMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineLeukemiaOncologyInduction therapyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: About two-thirds of AML patients harbor mutations in signaling and kinase pathways (e.g., FLT3, KRAS, NRAS, PTPN11, NF1, KIT), which utilize the growth factor receptor bound protein-2 (Grb2) to induce AML progression. Prexigebersen (BP1001), a liposome-incorporated Grb2 antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits Grb2 expression, suppresses cancer growth and survival. A Phase I/IB single center study (Ohanian, Lancet Haematol 2018) in relapsed/refractory AML patients demonstrated BP1001 safety up to 90 mg/m 2 and demonstrated CR/CRi in 3 of 6 relapsed/refractory AML patients treated with BP1001 + low dose cytarabine combination in the Phase IB portion. Preclinical studies indicated that BP1001 enhanced the inhibitory effects of decitabine (DAC), or DAC + venetoclax (VEN) against AML cells. Thus, we designed a clinical trial with three treatment arms: (1) BP1001 + DAC + VEN for newly diagnosed AML, (2) BP1001 + DAC + VEN for relapsed/refractory AML, (3) BP1001 + DAC for relapsed/refractory AML patients who are VEN-resistant or -intolerant [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02781883]. The study was amended to obtain safety run-in data for patients treated with BP1001 + DAC first before proceeding to safety run-in for patients treated with BP1001 + DAC + VEN. Here we report the safety run-in and efficacy data of AML patients treated with BP1001 + DAC or BP1001 + DAC + VEN. Methods: This is a multi-center open-label, Phase II study in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML patients to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of BP1001 (given at 60 mg/m 2 over 2-3 h twice weekly for a total of 8 doses over a 28-day cycle) in combination with DAC (20 mg/m 2, once daily for 5 days) or in combination with DAC and VEN (400 mg, once daily). Eligible patients were considered unsuitable for or refused intensive chemotherapy and had ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients treated with at least 1 cycle of therapy were evaluable for safety run-in. Results: Between April 2018 and May 2020, 6 patients (4 male: 67%) with median age 72 years (range, 51 - 76) were treated with at least 1 cycle of BP1001 + DAC combination therapy. Four patients (67%) had de novo AML and two (33%) had secondary AML. All patients in this cohort were considered high risk due to having either adverse risk status by ELN (n=5) or treated secondary AML (n=1) (transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm after failing 4 lines of prior therapy). Adverse events (AEs) were generally consistent with those expected with DAC and/or AML and included diarrhea (67%), fatigue (50%), constipation (50%), nausea (50%), dyspnea (50%), hypoxia (50%), hypotension (50%) and pain in extremity (50%). The most frequent serious AE (SAE) was bacteremia (33%). Two de novo patients (33%) achieved a CRi and 1 treated secondary AML patient (17%) achieved a PR. Patients received a median of 2.5 cycles of therapy (range, 1 - 6); median duration of follow-up was 140 days (range, 72 - 678). Since May 2020, 6 patients (2 male: 33%) with median age 61 years (range, 44 - 81) were treated with at least 1 cycle of BP1001 + DAC + VEN combination therapy. Two (33%) had de novo AML, and four (67%) were relapsed/refractory. All patients in this cohort were adverse-risk by ELN (n=2) or relapsed/refractory (n=4). AEs were generally as expected with DAC, VEN and/or AML, including fatigue (67%), diarrhea (67%), constipation (67%), decreased appetite (67%), hypokalemia (67%), hypocalcemia (50%), edema peripheral (50%), asthenia (50%), nausea (50%), abdominal pain (50%), dysphagia (50%), hypotension (50%) and febrile neutropenia (50%). The most frequent SAEs were sepsis (33%) and febrile neutropenia (50%). Four patients (67%) achieved a CR/CRi/MLFS (n=1/2/1) and 1 (17%) achieved a PR. Of these patients, 3 were relapsed/refractory (1 CR/1 CRi/1 MLFS) and two were de novo (1 CRi/1 PR). Patients received a median of 4 cycles of therapy (range, 1 - 9); median duration of follow-up was 177 days (range, 113 - 318). Conclusions: BP1001-based combination therapy has been safely administered to high-risk and relapsed/refractory AML patients who were considered unsuitable for standard chemotherapy. Preliminary data showed the combination treatment of BP1001 + DAC or BP1001 + DAC + VEN was well-tolerated, with encouraging efficacy signals. The study will continue enrollment across all three cohorts. Drug dosing for the study will proceed as planned. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Ritchie: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pemmaraju: Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus: Other, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Borthakur: Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; Astex: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tari Ashizawa: Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kantarjian: Immunogen: Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria. Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roboz: Amgen: Consultancy; MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207