Safety and Efficacy of Lower Intensity Induction Therapy with Intravenous Prexigebersen (BP1001) in Patients with High-Risk and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: About two-thirds of AML patients harbor mutations in signaling and kinase pathways (e.g., FLT3, KRAS, NRAS, PTPN11, NF1, KIT), which utilize the growth factor receptor bound protein-2 (Grb2) to induce AML progression. Prexigebersen (BP1001), a liposome-incorporated Grb2 antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits Grb2 expression, suppresses cancer growth and survival. A Phase I/IB single center study (Ohanian, Lancet Haematol 2018) in relapsed/refractory AML patients demonstrated BP1001 safety up to 90 mg/m 2 and demonstrated CR/CRi in 3 of 6 relapsed/refractory AML patients treated with BP1001 + low dose cytarabine combination in the Phase IB portion. Preclinical studies indicated that BP1001 enhanced the inhibitory effects of decitabine (DAC), or DAC + venetoclax (VEN) against AML cells. Thus, we designed a clinical trial with three treatment arms: (1) BP1001 + DAC + VEN for newly diagnosed AML, (2) BP1001 + DAC + VEN for relapsed/refractory AML, (3) BP1001 + DAC for relapsed/refractory AML patients who are VEN-resistant or -intolerant [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02781883]. The study was amended to obtain safety run-in data for patients treated with BP1001 + DAC first before proceeding to safety run-in for patients treated with BP1001 + DAC + VEN. Here we report the safety run-in and efficacy data of AML patients treated with BP1001 + DAC or BP1001 + DAC + VEN. Methods: This is a multi-center open-label, Phase II study in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML patients to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of BP1001 (given at 60 mg/m 2 over 2-3 h twice weekly for a total of 8 doses over a 28-day cycle) in combination with DAC (20 mg/m 2, once daily for 5 days) or in combination with DAC and VEN (400 mg, once daily). Eligible patients were considered unsuitable for or refused intensive chemotherapy and had ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients treated with at least 1 cycle of therapy were evaluable for safety run-in. Results: Between April 2018 and May 2020, 6 patients (4 male: 67%) with median age 72 years (range, 51 - 76) were treated with at least 1 cycle of BP1001 + DAC combination therapy. Four patients (67%) had de novo AML and two (33%) had secondary AML. All patients in this cohort were considered high risk due to having either adverse risk status by ELN (n=5) or treated secondary AML (n=1) (transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm after failing 4 lines of prior therapy). Adverse events (AEs) were generally consistent with those expected with DAC and/or AML and included diarrhea (67%), fatigue (50%), constipation (50%), nausea (50%), dyspnea (50%), hypoxia (50%), hypotension (50%) and pain in extremity (50%). The most frequent serious AE (SAE) was bacteremia (33%). Two de novo patients (33%) achieved a CRi and 1 treated secondary AML patient (17%) achieved a PR. Patients received a median of 2.5 cycles of therapy (range, 1 - 6); median duration of follow-up was 140 days (range, 72 - 678). Since May 2020, 6 patients (2 male: 33%) with median age 61 years (range, 44 - 81) were treated with at least 1 cycle of BP1001 + DAC + VEN combination therapy. Two (33%) had de novo AML, and four (67%) were relapsed/refractory. All patients in this cohort were adverse-risk by ELN (n=2) or relapsed/refractory (n=4). AEs were generally as expected with DAC, VEN and/or AML, including fatigue (67%), diarrhea (67%), constipation (67%), decreased appetite (67%), hypokalemia (67%), hypocalcemia (50%), edema peripheral (50%), asthenia (50%), nausea (50%), abdominal pain (50%), dysphagia (50%), hypotension (50%) and febrile neutropenia (50%). The most frequent SAEs were sepsis (33%) and febrile neutropenia (50%). Four patients (67%) achieved a CR/CRi/MLFS (n=1/2/1) and 1 (17%) achieved a PR. Of these patients, 3 were relapsed/refractory (1 CR/1 CRi/1 MLFS) and two were de novo (1 CRi/1 PR). Patients received a median of 4 cycles of therapy (range, 1 - 9); median duration of follow-up was 177 days (range, 113 - 318). Conclusions: BP1001-based combination therapy has been safely administered to high-risk and relapsed/refractory AML patients who were considered unsuitable for standard chemotherapy. Preliminary data showed the combination treatment of BP1001 + DAC or BP1001 + DAC + VEN was well-tolerated, with encouraging efficacy signals. The study will continue enrollment across all three cohorts. Drug dosing for the study will proceed as planned. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Ritchie: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pemmaraju: Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus: Other, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Borthakur: Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; Astex: Research Funding; Protagonist: Consultancy; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tari Ashizawa: Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kantarjian: Immunogen: Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria. Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roboz: Amgen: Consultancy; MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".