Third Party Citizen Reactions to Interventions in a Genocide: The Influence of the Social Categorization of Victims and the Norm of a Responsibility to Protect
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Groups involved in ongoing genocidal conflicts within a nation may appeal to third nations, who are neither perpetrators nor victims, as potential allies.The present research investigated social psychological factors that influence citizens of a third party country (Canada) to support and participate in actions to intervene in an ongoing genocidal conflict in a distant region of the world (Darfur).Study 1 (n = 135) examined the influence of social categorization (decategorization, outgroup and common ingroup) on participants' endorsement of prosocial actions, as well as the mediating role of psychological antecedents, including perception of complicity in the genocide due to inaction, perception that the ingroup could be held accountable for their inaction, and guilt (for the situation of the victims and for the ingroup's inaction).The results suggested that framing the plight of victims of genocide in terms of the victimization of particular individuals might be more effective in eliciting appraisals and emotions that encourage support for intervention.Study 2 (n = 100) built on the results of Study 1 to explore whether the influence of recategorization of the victims as humans (relative to outgroup members) on endorsement of prosocial actions and its antecedents was moderated by individuals' evaluation of human beings (humanity-esteem).The moderation hypothesis was not supported; however, portraying the victims as a part of a common humanity was associated with greater feelings of guilt for the victims' plight.In addition, the more participants held humans in high esteem, the more likely they were to endorse government intervention.Study 3 (n = 321) assessed whether the relations among complicity, feelings of guilt and prosocial actions were altered when competing norms that prescribed action against genocide were made salient (i.e., the norm of a iii responsibility to protect versus the norm of non-intervention in a sovereign country).It appears that people were more likely to comply with norms that prescribed demanding actions, such as the protection of others, only when there were no alternative norms that provided an escape from such obligations.The implications of these findings for citizen support for international interventions in conflict regions are discussed.I would like to acknowledge the contribution of several individuals and organizations that have made the completion of this doctoral thesis possible.First, I would like to acknowledge the doctoral scholarships that were awarded to me by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; 200710CGD-188128-159950) and by Carleton University.I would also like to thank the participants in my studies for their time.A special thanks goes to member of my
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».