Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Persons with Mild or Moderate Hemophilia A: Results from the Interim Analysis of the HAVEN 6 Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor (F)IX and FX, substituting for the function of missing activated FVIII in persons with hemophilia A (HA). The HAVEN 6 study (NCT04158648) aims to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emicizumab prophylaxis in persons with mild or moderate HA without FVIII inhibitors. Here we report the results of the interim analysis (IA). Methods: HAVEN 6 is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label study of emicizumab in persons with mild (FVIII level >5%-<40%) or moderate (FVIII level ≥1%-≤5%) HA without FVIII inhibitors, who warrant prophylaxis as assessed by the treating physician. Participants received loading doses of emicizumab 3 mg/kg once per week (QW) for 4 weeks, followed by maintenance doses of either 1.5 mg/kg QW, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Safety endpoints include adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest, including thromboembolic events (TEs) and thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). Efficacy endpoints include negative binomial-regression model estimates of annualized bleed rate (ABR) for treated bleeds, all bleeds, and joint/target joint/spontaneous bleeds; change from baseline in Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS); health-related quality of life using the Comprehensive Assessment Tool of Challenges in Hemophilia (CATCH); and treatment preference as measured by the Emicizumab Preference (EmiPref) questionnaire. PK, PD, and immunogenicity are evaluated. The IA was conducted after ≥50 participants with moderate HA completed ≥24 weeks on study or withdrew. Results: Of the 72 participants enrolled, 71 received emicizumab and were included in the analysis. Median (range) follow-up period was 27.5 (6.7-61.7) weeks. Participants (69 males; 2 females) had a median (range) age of 23.0 (2-71) years (Table 1). Twenty participants (28.2%) had mild and 51 (71.8%) moderate HA; 37 participants (52.1%) were on FVIII prophylaxis at baseline. Participants had a median (range) of 2.0 (0-60) bleeds in the 24 weeks prior to emicizumab prophylaxis; 24 participants (33.8%) had target joints at baseline. Forty-nine participants (69.0%) had ≥1 AE (Table 2); headache was the most common (14.1%). The majority of AEs (84.5%) were not emicizumab-related. Local injection-site reactions were reported for nine participants (12.7%); all were emicizumab-related. One participant (1.4%) experienced two Grade ≥3 AEs, neither emicizumab-related. Four participants (5.6%) reported a total of six SAEs; none were considered emicizumab-related by the investigator. There were no deaths, AEs leading to treatment withdrawal/modification/interruption, TEs, or TMAs. The model-based ABR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for treated bleeds was 0.8 (0.41-1.46; Table 3). ABR (95% CI) for all bleeds was 2.3 (1.63-3.10), for treated joint bleeds 0.3 (0.12-0.65), and for treated spontaneous bleeds 0.1 (0.02-0.23). Calculated median ABRs were zero for all bleed categories except 'all bleeds'. Zero bleeds were reported for 80.3% (treated bleeds), 46.5% (all bleeds), 90.1% (treated joint bleeds), 95.8% (treated spontaneous bleeds), and 94.4% (treated target joint bleeds) of participants. Two participants (2.8%) had anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), one of these had ADAs that were neutralizing in vitro; however, no clinical impact or impact on emicizumab PK was observed. Emicizumab trough concentrations were 10%-15% higher compared with HAVEN 1-4 (Callaghan, et al. Blood 2021). A mean (standard deviation) improvement in HJHS total score from baseline of -1.77 (2.94) was observed at Week 25 (n=47). The trend for improvement from baseline in the treatment burden domain for CATCH was consistent across age groups (8-17 and >18 years). Except for a small improvement in 'social activity risk perception' among adolescents, the remaining CATCH domains were stable. Improvements were observed in 'treatment burden' and 'preoccupation' domains among caregivers, but due to small sample number, trends should be interpreted with caution. Overall, 48/50 (96.0%) EmiPref respondents preferred emicizumab over their previous HA therapy. Conclusions: Data at the IA of the HAVEN 6 study indicate that emicizumab has a favorable safety profile and is efficacious in bleed prevention for persons with mild or moderate HA, which is in line with results from the HAVEN/STASEY studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Négrier: Biomarin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi-Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UniQure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahlangu: Univeristy of the Witwatersrand: Current Employment; Biomarin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Unique: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; WFH: Speakers Bureau; ISTH: Speakers Bureau; Springer: Speakers Bureau. Lehle: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Chowdary: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Freeline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Spark: Honoraria. Catalani: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Jiménez-Yuste: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Beckermann: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schmitt: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Co-inventor: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor of a patent relating to an anti-FIXa/FX bispecific antibody. Hermans: Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc: Current Employment; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Ventriglia: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Other: Holds stocks. Windyga: Alfasigma: Honoraria; Aspen: Honoraria; Bayer AG: Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swixx BioPharma: Honoraria; Werfen: Honoraria; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sanofi/Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kiialainen: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. d'Oiron: Shire/Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biomarin: Honoraria, Research
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».