MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213505659 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-146009

Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Persons with Mild or Moderate Hemophilia A: Results from the Interim Analysis of the HAVEN 6 Study

2021· article· en· W3213505659 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Négrier, Johnny Mahlangu, Michaela Lehle, Pratima Chowdary, Olivier Catalani, Víctor Jiménez‐Yuste, Benjamin M. Beckermann, Christophe Schmitt, Cédric Hermans, Giuliana Ventriglia, Jerzy Windyga, Anna Kiialainen, Roseline d’Oiron, Paul Moorehead, Vanda Teodoro, Amy D. Shapiro, Johannes Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterim analysisAdverse effectInternal medicineInterimClinical trialPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor (F)IX and FX, substituting for the function of missing activated FVIII in persons with hemophilia A (HA). The HAVEN 6 study (NCT04158648) aims to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emicizumab prophylaxis in persons with mild or moderate HA without FVIII inhibitors. Here we report the results of the interim analysis (IA). Methods: HAVEN 6 is a Phase III, multicenter, open-label study of emicizumab in persons with mild (FVIII level >5%-<40%) or moderate (FVIII level ≥1%-≤5%) HA without FVIII inhibitors, who warrant prophylaxis as assessed by the treating physician. Participants received loading doses of emicizumab 3 mg/kg once per week (QW) for 4 weeks, followed by maintenance doses of either 1.5 mg/kg QW, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Safety endpoints include adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest, including thromboembolic events (TEs) and thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). Efficacy endpoints include negative binomial-regression model estimates of annualized bleed rate (ABR) for treated bleeds, all bleeds, and joint/target joint/spontaneous bleeds; change from baseline in Hemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS); health-related quality of life using the Comprehensive Assessment Tool of Challenges in Hemophilia (CATCH); and treatment preference as measured by the Emicizumab Preference (EmiPref) questionnaire. PK, PD, and immunogenicity are evaluated. The IA was conducted after ≥50 participants with moderate HA completed ≥24 weeks on study or withdrew. Results: Of the 72 participants enrolled, 71 received emicizumab and were included in the analysis. Median (range) follow-up period was 27.5 (6.7-61.7) weeks. Participants (69 males; 2 females) had a median (range) age of 23.0 (2-71) years (Table 1). Twenty participants (28.2%) had mild and 51 (71.8%) moderate HA; 37 participants (52.1%) were on FVIII prophylaxis at baseline. Participants had a median (range) of 2.0 (0-60) bleeds in the 24 weeks prior to emicizumab prophylaxis; 24 participants (33.8%) had target joints at baseline. Forty-nine participants (69.0%) had ≥1 AE (Table 2); headache was the most common (14.1%). The majority of AEs (84.5%) were not emicizumab-related. Local injection-site reactions were reported for nine participants (12.7%); all were emicizumab-related. One participant (1.4%) experienced two Grade ≥3 AEs, neither emicizumab-related. Four participants (5.6%) reported a total of six SAEs; none were considered emicizumab-related by the investigator. There were no deaths, AEs leading to treatment withdrawal/modification/interruption, TEs, or TMAs. The model-based ABR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for treated bleeds was 0.8 (0.41-1.46; Table 3). ABR (95% CI) for all bleeds was 2.3 (1.63-3.10), for treated joint bleeds 0.3 (0.12-0.65), and for treated spontaneous bleeds 0.1 (0.02-0.23). Calculated median ABRs were zero for all bleed categories except 'all bleeds'. Zero bleeds were reported for 80.3% (treated bleeds), 46.5% (all bleeds), 90.1% (treated joint bleeds), 95.8% (treated spontaneous bleeds), and 94.4% (treated target joint bleeds) of participants. Two participants (2.8%) had anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), one of these had ADAs that were neutralizing in vitro; however, no clinical impact or impact on emicizumab PK was observed. Emicizumab trough concentrations were 10%-15% higher compared with HAVEN 1-4 (Callaghan, et al. Blood 2021). A mean (standard deviation) improvement in HJHS total score from baseline of -1.77 (2.94) was observed at Week 25 (n=47). The trend for improvement from baseline in the treatment burden domain for CATCH was consistent across age groups (8-17 and >18 years). Except for a small improvement in 'social activity risk perception' among adolescents, the remaining CATCH domains were stable. Improvements were observed in 'treatment burden' and 'preoccupation' domains among caregivers, but due to small sample number, trends should be interpreted with caution. Overall, 48/50 (96.0%) EmiPref respondents preferred emicizumab over their previous HA therapy. Conclusions: Data at the IA of the HAVEN 6 study indicate that emicizumab has a favorable safety profile and is efficacious in bleed prevention for persons with mild or moderate HA, which is in line with results from the HAVEN/STASEY studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Négrier: Biomarin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi-Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UniQure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahlangu: Univeristy of the Witwatersrand: Current Employment; Biomarin: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Unique: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; WFH: Speakers Bureau; ISTH: Speakers Bureau; Springer: Speakers Bureau. Lehle: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Chowdary: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Freeline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Spark: Honoraria. Catalani: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Jiménez-Yuste: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Beckermann: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schmitt: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Co-inventor: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor of a patent relating to an anti-FIXa/FX bispecific antibody. Hermans: Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc: Current Employment; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Ventriglia: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Other: Holds stocks. Windyga: Alfasigma: Honoraria; Aspen: Honoraria; Bayer AG: Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swixx BioPharma: Honoraria; Werfen: Honoraria; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sanofi/Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kiialainen: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. d'Oiron: Shire/Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biomarin: Honoraria, Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207