Characterizing Safety in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-SCT) Following Pembrolizumab Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) and checkpoint blockade both have efficacy in some lymphoid malignancies. However, the safety of allo-SCT after programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in these patients (pts) remains a question of high clinical interest. We present data from an analysis from 4 KEYNOTE phase 1-3 studies to assess the incidence and severity of complications in pts who received allo-SCT following pembrolizumab therapy. Methods: The analysis included pts with a known transplant date who received an allo-SCT within 2 years of the last dose of study pembrolizumab from the KEYNOTE-013 (NCT01953692, n=20), KEYNOTE-087 (NCT02453594, n=31), KEYNOTE-170 (NCT02576990, n=5), and KEYNOTE-204 (NCT02684292, n=14) trials. Descriptive statistics were used for prespecified complications of interest following allo-SCT. The cumulative incidence of acute grade 2-4 graft versus host disease (GVHD), acute grade 3-4 GVHD, and chronic GVHD was estimated. The corresponding competing risk events were death without acute grade 2-4 GVHD, death without acute grade 3-4 GVHD, and death without chronic GVHD, respectively. In addition, the cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) post-allo-SCT was estimated with relapse as a competing risk. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Seventy patients were evaluable for this analysis. Median age was 30 y (range, 18-65), 57 (81.4%) had classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and the rest had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Sixty-nine pts (98.6%) received pembrolizumab monotherapy and the remainder received pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide. Median duration on study treatment was 5.34 months (range, 0.72-29.60) and median time from last pembrolizumab dose to first allo-SCT was 4.6 months (range, 1-20). Post-pembrolizumab and before allo-SCT, 49 pts (70.0%) had intervening anticancer regimen; 34 (48.6%) had active disease, 31 pts (44.3%) were in remission at time of transplant, and 5 pts (7.1%) had unknown disease status. Forty-four pts (62.9%) received reduced-intensity conditioning, 25 pts (35.7%) received full-intensity conditioning, and 1 pt (1.4%) had missing data. In terms of donor source, 31.4% were haploidentical, 25.7% matched sibling, 31.4% matched unrelated. A total of 55 pts (78.6%) developed GVHD, 54.3% with acute GVHD and 24.3% with chronic GVHD. The estimated cumulative incidence was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.30-0.53) for grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.12-0.30) for grade 3-4 acute GVHD, both at 6 months post-allo-SCT and was 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.31) for chronic GVHD at 1 year post-allo-SCT. Common sites affected by chronic GVHD were skin, liver, and oral mucosa. Other predetermined complications, including critical illness, immune-mediated adverse events, pulmonary complications, and venoocclusive liver disease, occurred in 32 pts (45.7%). With a median follow-up, defined as the time from allo-SCT to data cutoff or death, of 30.9 months (range, 0.85-71.2) , the post-allo-SCT median PFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 14.5-NR) and the 30-month post-allo-SCT PFS rate was 56.8% (95% CI, 42.9-68.5) (Figure A); median overall survival (OS) was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) and the OS rate at 12 months was 82.2% (Figure B). The estimated cumulative incidence for TRM at 18-month post-allo-SCT was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21). Conclusions: The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD in this population seems similar to that from historical data (40%-72% and 30%-70%, respectively), although the incidence of severe acute GVHD may be higher than a typical modern allo-SCT series. Despite this, the TRM was low. Furthermore, PFS in the subgroup of pts with cHL was favorable compared to historical series of pts without prior PD-1 blockade, which is consistent with other studies in this population. Altogether, this analysis provides reassurance that allo-SCT is feasible for pts after PD-1 blockade, with PFS and OS outcomes that may in fact be better than historical benchmarks. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Armand: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy; GenMab: Consultancy; C4: Consultancy; Enterome: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; IGM: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding. Kuruvilla: Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Antengene: Honoraria; Medison Ventures: Honoraria. Herrera: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Seagen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tubulis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Ribrag: Argen-X: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brice: Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; MSD: Research Funding. Thieblemont: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses , Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Hospira: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses . Von Tresckow: Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress and travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: congress and travel support; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding. Kim: Merck: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Orlowski: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Chakraborty: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Marinello: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Zinzani: Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Spe
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».