MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3213598721 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-148528

Characterizing Safety in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-SCT) Following Pembrolizumab Therapy

2021· article· en· W3213598721 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Armand, John Kuruvilla, Alex F. Herrera, Vincent Ribrag, Pauline Brice, Catherine Thiéblemont, Bastian von Tresckow, Eunhee Kim, Robert Orlowski, Samhita Chakraborty, Patricia Marinello, Pier Luigi Zinzani

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCumulative incidencePembrolizumabInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)TransplantationOncologyLymphomaGraft-versus-host diseaseGastroenterologySurgeryCancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) and checkpoint blockade both have efficacy in some lymphoid malignancies. However, the safety of allo-SCT after programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in these patients (pts) remains a question of high clinical interest. We present data from an analysis from 4 KEYNOTE phase 1-3 studies to assess the incidence and severity of complications in pts who received allo-SCT following pembrolizumab therapy. Methods: The analysis included pts with a known transplant date who received an allo-SCT within 2 years of the last dose of study pembrolizumab from the KEYNOTE-013 (NCT01953692, n=20), KEYNOTE-087 (NCT02453594, n=31), KEYNOTE-170 (NCT02576990, n=5), and KEYNOTE-204 (NCT02684292, n=14) trials. Descriptive statistics were used for prespecified complications of interest following allo-SCT. The cumulative incidence of acute grade 2-4 graft versus host disease (GVHD), acute grade 3-4 GVHD, and chronic GVHD was estimated. The corresponding competing risk events were death without acute grade 2-4 GVHD, death without acute grade 3-4 GVHD, and death without chronic GVHD, respectively. In addition, the cumulative incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) post-allo-SCT was estimated with relapse as a competing risk. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Seventy patients were evaluable for this analysis. Median age was 30 y (range, 18-65), 57 (81.4%) had classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and the rest had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Sixty-nine pts (98.6%) received pembrolizumab monotherapy and the remainder received pembrolizumab in combination with lenalidomide. Median duration on study treatment was 5.34 months (range, 0.72-29.60) and median time from last pembrolizumab dose to first allo-SCT was 4.6 months (range, 1-20). Post-pembrolizumab and before allo-SCT, 49 pts (70.0%) had intervening anticancer regimen; 34 (48.6%) had active disease, 31 pts (44.3%) were in remission at time of transplant, and 5 pts (7.1%) had unknown disease status. Forty-four pts (62.9%) received reduced-intensity conditioning, 25 pts (35.7%) received full-intensity conditioning, and 1 pt (1.4%) had missing data. In terms of donor source, 31.4% were haploidentical, 25.7% matched sibling, 31.4% matched unrelated. A total of 55 pts (78.6%) developed GVHD, 54.3% with acute GVHD and 24.3% with chronic GVHD. The estimated cumulative incidence was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.30-0.53) for grade 2-4 acute GVHD and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.12-0.30) for grade 3-4 acute GVHD, both at 6 months post-allo-SCT and was 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.31) for chronic GVHD at 1 year post-allo-SCT. Common sites affected by chronic GVHD were skin, liver, and oral mucosa. Other predetermined complications, including critical illness, immune-mediated adverse events, pulmonary complications, and venoocclusive liver disease, occurred in 32 pts (45.7%). With a median follow-up, defined as the time from allo-SCT to data cutoff or death, of 30.9 months (range, 0.85-71.2) , the post-allo-SCT median PFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 14.5-NR) and the 30-month post-allo-SCT PFS rate was 56.8% (95% CI, 42.9-68.5) (Figure A); median overall survival (OS) was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) and the OS rate at 12 months was 82.2% (Figure B). The estimated cumulative incidence for TRM at 18-month post-allo-SCT was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21). Conclusions: The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD in this population seems similar to that from historical data (40%-72% and 30%-70%, respectively), although the incidence of severe acute GVHD may be higher than a typical modern allo-SCT series. Despite this, the TRM was low. Furthermore, PFS in the subgroup of pts with cHL was favorable compared to historical series of pts without prior PD-1 blockade, which is consistent with other studies in this population. Altogether, this analysis provides reassurance that allo-SCT is feasible for pts after PD-1 blockade, with PFS and OS outcomes that may in fact be better than historical benchmarks. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Armand: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy; GenMab: Consultancy; C4: Consultancy; Enterome: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; IGM: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding. Kuruvilla: Incyte: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Antengene: Honoraria; Medison Ventures: Honoraria. Herrera: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Seagen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tubulis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Ribrag: Argen-X: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brice: Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; MSD: Research Funding. Thieblemont: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses , Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses ; Hospira: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses . Von Tresckow: Pentixafarm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress and travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: congress and travel support; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: congress and travel support, Research Funding. Kim: Merck: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Orlowski: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Chakraborty: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Marinello: Merck & Co., Inc.: Current Employment, Other: Current Stockholder. Zinzani: Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Spe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→