MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3213974098 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-145723

Analysis of Duration of Response, Exposure-Adjusted Safety and Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) for Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Receiving Luspatercept in the MEDALIST Study

2021· article· en· W3213974098 sur OpenAlexaff
Uwe Platzbecker, Valeria Santini, Rami S. Komrokji, Amer M. Zeidan, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Rena Buckstein, Shelonitda Rose, Shannon Fabre, Dimana Miteva, Jennie Zhang, Aylin Yücel, Christina Hughes, Pierre Fenaux

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyelodysplastic syndromesMedicineMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineOncologyLeukemiaCytarabineBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Patients with LR-MDS who are refractory or ineligible for treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited treatment options for anemia. Luspatercept is a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent that enhances late-stage erythropoiesis, and is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of anemia in adult patients with LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with RS and thrombocytosis after ESA failure. In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 MEDALIST study, luspatercept significantly reduced transfusion burden versus placebo in patients with LR-MDS (NCT02631070; Fenaux P, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;382:140-151). Here we report additional analyses from the final data cut of the MEDALIST study, including: duration of treatment and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) response; the number of responses per patient; exposure-adjusted rates of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); and time to progression to AML. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age; had IPSS-R-defined Very low-, Low-, or Intermediate-risk MDS with RS; were refractory, intolerant, or unlikely to respond to ESAs (serum erythropoietin > 200 U/L); and required regular RBC transfusions. Patients were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (starting dose 1.0 mg/kg, with titration up to 1.75 mg/kg) or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks (wk). The primary endpoint was achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 8 wk during the first 24 wk of treatment. The duration of treatment in wk was calculated by (1 + the number of days between first dose and end of treatment) / 7. End of treatment date was either the last dose date plus 20 days, the study discontinuation date, or the death date, whichever was earlier. Duration of response was defined as the longest duration of RBC-TI response during the entire treatment period for patients who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 8 wk during wk 1-24 or wk 1-48. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated per 100 patient-years for TEAEs (any grade) in ≥ 5% of patients in any treatment group. Time to AML progression was defined as the time between the randomization date and the date of first AML diagnosis. Results: As of November 26, 2020, the median duration of treatment for patients randomized to luspatercept was 50.9 wk (range 6-207) versus 24.0 wk (range 7-103) for placebo. Patients randomized to luspatercept received a median of 17 doses (range 2-66) of treatment versus 8 doses (range 3-34) for placebo. Overall, 58 of 153 (37.9%) patients who received luspatercept achieved RBC-TI during any consecutive 8-wk period during wk 1-24, versus 10 of 76 (13.2%) for placebo. Of those achieving a response (RBC-TI ≥ 8 wk) during wk 1-24, the median duration of RBC-TI was 30.2 wk (range 8.1-201.1) for patients randomized to luspatercept versus 13.6 wk (range 9.1-66.4) for placebo, and 29.9 wk (range 8.1-201.1) for patients randomized to luspatercept versus 17.4 wk (range 9.1-66.4) for placebo, for those who responded during wk 1-48. Among patients who responded during wk 1-24 in the luspatercept arm, 17 (29.3%), 13 (22.4%), and 16 (27.6%) patients experienced 2, 3, or ≥ 4 separate RBC-TI ≥ 8-wk response events during the entire treatment period, versus 3 (30%) and 1 (10%) patients in the placebo arm, who experienced 2 or 3 response events. The only TEAEs with exposure-adjusted incidence rates ≥ 5 per 100 person-years higher in patients randomized to luspatercept versus placebo were: diarrhea (25.8 versus 18.4); dizziness (19.2 versus 8.9); nausea (20.1 versus 13.7); bronchitis (10.7 versus 2.2); vertigo (5.8 versus 0); and influenza (5.3 versus 0). Four of 153 (2.6%) patients randomized to luspatercept experienced progression to AML versus 3 of 76 (3.9%) patients randomized to placebo. The median time from randomization to AML progression for patients randomized to luspatercept was 61.7 months (range 56.7-223.6) versus 32.7 months (range 30.1-60.4) for placebo. Conclusions: Up through wk 48, patients randomized to luspatercept in the MEDALIST study remained on treatment longer and had more durable and repeated episodes of RBC-TI response events than placebo. Luspatercept had a tolerable safety profile when adjusted for exposure and patients receiving luspatercept had a longer time to AML progression than placebo. Luspatercept demonstrated durable responses over a longer time period in patients with anemia who have limited treatment options. Disclosures Platzbecker: Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Santini: Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji: Geron: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Zeidan: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; BeyondSpring: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding; Jasper: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Ionis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding. Buckstein: Celgene: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; TAIHO: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rose: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Fabre: BMS: Current Employment. Miteva: BMS: Current Employment. Zhang: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Patents & Royalties . Yucel: BMS: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Hughes: BMS: Current Employment. Fenaux: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,031

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,004
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→