MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214043801 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-146572

Single-Cell Proteogenomic Sequencing Allows Early Detection of Relapse Clone with CN-LOH at <i>FLT3</i>-ITD Locus from Initial Diagnosis in AML

2021· article· en· W3214043801 sur OpenAlexaff
Tae-Hyung Kim, Hyewon Lee, José‐Mario Capo‐Chichi, Myung Hee Chang, Young Seok Yoo, Gurbaksh Basi, Troy Ketela, Adam C. Smith, Anne Tierens, Mark D. Minden, Zhaolei Zhang, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNPM1OncologyMedicineInternal medicineMidostaurinCDKN2AMyeloid leukemiaBiologyKaryotypeGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction FLT3-ITD is one of the most common and clinically relevant mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) (>0.5) is strongly associated with poor prognosis. FLT3-ITDs are heterogeneous mutations, varying in sizes and locations with some patients having multiple FLT3-ITDs. Unfortunately, conventional clinical techniques are often not adequate in measuring these characteristics at sufficient resolution. The current study aimed to characterize an AML case with 2 FLT3-ITDs at diagnosis, map the multi-omic evolution of AML clones, and understand genetic patterns underlying AML relapse using single-cell proteogenomic sequencing (ScPGseq). Methods Leukemic samples from a 46-year old female patient diagnosed with de novo AML obtained at initial diagnosis and relapse were archived and used in this study. Based on the 2017 ELN risk stratification, the patient was classified into a low-risk group due to normal karyotype/low FLT3-ITD AR/NPM1+. The patient achieved complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy in combination with midostaurin. The patient relapsed 2 months after 4 cycles of consolidation, with a CR duration of 6 months. After relapse, the disease was refractory despite reinduction and salvage therapies, even with gilteritinib (Fig A). ScPGseq was performed using the Mission Bio's AML panel and antibody oligoconjugates for 16 cell surface proteins. Raw sequencing reads were processed using Mission Bio's Tapestri pipeline and results were exported from Tapestri Insights (v3.0.2). All downstream computational and statistical analyses were performed using R and Python. Results Consistent with clinical sequencing (R 2 = 0.997) and PCR, ScPGseq identified 5 mutations in FLT3 (21bp and 39bp ITDs and D835Y), NPM1, and WT1 at diagnosis (2367 cells). At relapse, 1 FLT3-ITD (21bp) and mutations in NPM1 and WT1 were detected while the other FLT3-ITD (39bp) and FLT3 D835Y were absent (2611 cells). Clonal analyses of mutation patterns identified 4 AML clones at diagnosis (C1-4) and 1 at relapse (C3R; Fig B). Two closely related clones, C3 and C3R (WT1+/NPM1+/21bp FLT3-ITD+) differed in zygosity of 21bp FLT3-ITD, where nearly all cells in C3R carries homozygous FLT3-ITD. SNP array confirmed the presence of copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in chr13q. Analysis of 16 cell surface proteins along with clonal information identified 3 clusters including one devoted to non-leukemic fractions (i.e., no mutations) (top) and another nearly exclusively consisting of mutant cells from diagnosis, which we termed "monocyte-like signature" (right bottom). The other cluster was composed of nearly all mutant cells from the relapse sample and about 1/3 of mutant cells from diagnosis, which we termed "immature myeloid cell signature" (left) (Fig C). When investigating further, C3 cells with immature myeloid cell signature (98/287 cells, 34.1%) exhibited much higher allelic burden of (mean 73% vs. 56%, adj. p < 1.1e-6) and were significantly enriched with homozygous 21bp FLT3-ITDs compared to C3 cells with monocyte-like signature (189/287 cells, 65.9%) (41/98 cells, 42% vs. 11/189 cells, 5.8%, adj. p = 2.7e-13). No other mutations showed similar patterns. It indicates that C3R existed from the initial diagnosis at low frequency, instead of losing heterozygosity during relapse. Without the single cell proteogenomic analyses, C3R cells, present in <5% cells at the initial diagnosis could have not been detected. The multi-omic information elucidates the complete clonal history of this AML (Fig D). Starting with WT1 and NPM1 mutations (C1), 3 FLT3 mutations (2 ITDs and D835Y) were subsequently acquired in 3 subclones (C2-4). A subset of C3 cells (WT1+/NPM1+/21bp FLT3-ITD+) further gained CN-LOH in chr13q (C3R at diagnosis). When treated, AML cells without homozygous 21bp FLT3-ITD were cleared. Cells with homozygous 21bp FLT3-ITD survived/escaped from the treatment and became the dominant clone at relapse (C3R at relapse). Conclusion The current study demonstrates that ScPGseq allows 1) simultaneous and comprehensive analyses of multiple FLT3-ITDs at the single-cell level 2) early detection of relapse clone with subclonal homozygous 21bp FLT3-ITD from the initial diagnosis, which explains one of the mechanisms of relapse in AML cases with low FLT3-ITD AR 3) multi-omic clonal analyses, which further refine clonal models relying only on mutation profiles. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Minden: Astellas: Consultancy. Kim: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Meier Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Paladin: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→