MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214376594 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-152987

Immune Repertoire Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Research Samples Using NGS Characterization of Multiple B Cell Receptors in a Single Reaction

2021· article· en· W3214376594 sur OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey Lowman, Landon Pastushok, Karen Mochoruk, Wayne Hill, Michelle Toro, Loni Pickle, Carolina González, Stephanie Ostresh, Shrutii Sarda, Chenchen Yang, Julie Stakiw, Mark Bosch, Hadi Goubran, Ronald Geyer, John F. DeCoteau

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyImmunoglobulin heavy chainChronic lymphocytic leukemiaImmunoglobulin light chainbreakpoint cluster regionB-cell receptorMolecular biologyMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationB cellIGHV@Gene rearrangementGeneticsPlasma cell neoplasmComputational biologyAntibodyGeneMultiple myelomaLeukemiaImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction B cell repertoire analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is at the forefront of leukemia and lymphoma research. Some advantages provided by NGS-based techniques include a lower limit-of-detection and simpler paths to standardization compared to other methods. Importantly, in research of post-germinal B cell disorders, such as multiple myeloma (MM), NGS methods allow for the study of clonal lineage based on somatic hypermuation patterns. Current targeted NGS assays require multiple libraries to survey each B cell receptor chain (IGH, IgK, IgL), and this fact is highlighted when initial clonality detection fails due to mutations under primer binding sites. This issue can be especially true in MM which has a high rate of SHM. To address these issues, we have developed an assay for B cell analysis, based on Ion AmpliSeq™ technology, which enables efficient detection of IGH, IgK, and IgL chain rearrangements in a single reaction. Methods The B cell pan-clonality panel (Oncomine™ BCR Pan-Clonality Assay) targets the framework 3 (FR3) portion of the variable gene and the joining gene region of heavy- and light-chain loci (IGH, IgK, IgL) for all alleles found within the IMGT database, enabling readout of the complementary-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequence of each immunoglobulin chain. To maximize sensitivity, we included primers to amplify IgK loci rearrangements involving Kappa deletion element and the constant region intron. To evaluate assay performance, we conducted reproducibility studies and clonality assessment using gDNA from a total of 45 MM research samples. All MM cases examined in this work were confirmed clonal previously by light chain restriction via flow cytometry or IHC/ISH in tissue sections - 16 of the 45 MM samples were identified as lambda light chain restricted. For comparison, a small cohort of 12 B-ALL samples were also included in the study. Sequencing and repertoire analyses were performed using the Ion GeneStudio S5 System and Ion Reporter 5.16 analysis software. Results Clonality assessment of MM clinical research samples show an 93% overall positive detection rate by an assay which combines the IGH, IgK, and IgL chains in a single reaction using published guidelines for clonality assignment. Thirty-four of 45 samples show positive detection of an IGH rearrangement, while 41 of 45 showed positive detection of at least one light chain receptor. In total, 42 of 45 samples were deemed clonal by the single tube assay based on detection for one or more receptor. Clonality results for this sample set are well correlated with orthogonal data from flow, IHC/ISH, or alternate NGS assays. A clonal lambda light chain was identified in 14 of 16 samples determined to be lambda restricted by flow cytometry. In two of the lambda restricted samples only a clonal lambda rearrangement was identified, showing the benefit of including primers targeting both the kappa and lambda light chains in a pan-clonality NGS assay. Both the MM and B-ALL cohorts were evaluated for biased IGHV gene usage. IGHV3-11 was observed in 5 of 45 MM and 5 of 12 B-ALL samples. IGHV4-34, typically linked to autoreactive antibodies and underrepresented in germinal center and memory B-cells, was nonetheless found in 5 of 45 MM samples surveyed. Estimates of somatic hypermutation rates were calculated using the BCR pan-clonality assay. Most MM samples, as expected, contained some somatic hypermutation with 6 of 45 samples showing greater than 10% mutation rates. Automated lineage analysis, based on somatic hypermuation signatures within each sample, identified 8 of 45 MM samples which contained 5 or more clones in the primary clonal lineage, with one case containing a lineage with 23 clones. Two MM samples showed no somatic hypermutation as measured using the FR3 primers contained in the BCR pan-clonality assay. These samples were also evaluated using an FR1-J targeted NGS assay, which confirmed relatively low mutation rates for these MM samples at 0.44% and 1.3%, respectively. Conclusions These results demonstrate the utility of a novel assay for combined repertoire analysis of B cell receptor heavy and light chains in a single library preparation reaction. We expect this assay to simplify laboratory workflows and including analysis tools such as automated somatic hypermutation rate calculation and clonal lineage identification may open new paths for research in lymphoid cell disorders. For research use only. Disclosures Lowman: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment. Toro: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment. Pickle: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment. Ostresh: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment. Sarda: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment. Yang: Thermo Fisher Scientific: Current Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→Travaux en français237 207→