MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214400070 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-146987

Phase 1 Study of JNJ-64619178, a Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 Inhibitor, in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

2021· article· en· W3214400070 sur OpenAlexaff
Tamanna Haque, Félix López Cadenas, Blanca Xicoy, Ana Alfonso Piérola, Uwe Platzbecker, Irit Avivi, Andrew M. Brunner, Jörg Chromik, Daniel Morillo, Manish R. Patel, José Falantes, Heather A. Leitch, Ulrich Germing, Meir Preis, David Lavie, Laurie Lenox, Josh Lauring, Anna Kalota, Regina Brown, Jaydeep Mehta, Friederike Pastore, Pankaj Mistry, David Valcárcel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCancer-related gene regulation
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTolerabilityMedicineMyelodysplastic syndromesSplicing factorInternal medicinePharmacodynamicsProtein arginine methyltransferase 5International Prognostic Scoring SystemPharmacologyOncologyMethyltransferaseCancer researchGastroenterologyAdverse effectPharmacokineticsRNA splicingBiologyMethylationGeneBone marrowGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by frequent mutations in RNA splicing factor genes. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) regulates the activity of the splicing machinery through methylation of key spliceosome proteins. PRMT5 inhibitors have demonstrated preferential killing of acute myeloid leukemia cells with splicing factor mutations. JNJ-64619178 is a potent, selective, oral PRMT5 inhibitor that causes accumulation of splicing abnormalities in preclinical models. It is hypothesized that inhibition of PRMT5 by JNJ-64619178 may target splicing factor gene mutant MDS clones, leading to recovery of normal hematopoiesis. Here we present Part 2 of a phase 1 study of JNJ-64619178 evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary clinical activity of JNJ-64619178 in adult patients (pts) with lower risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] score Low or Intermediate-1) who are red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent and relapsed or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment. Methods Dosing was initiated at 2 mg, 14 days on/7 days off (intermittent) on a 21-day cycle, a tolerable dose from the ongoing dose escalation in solid tumors and lymphomas in Part 1. Confirmation of tolerability followed a modified 3+3 design with de-escalation allowed based on the totality of the data. Enrollment was expanded at the selected, tolerable dose level to further evaluate safety, PK, PD, and preliminary clinical activity. Results As of 29 May 2021, 21 pts were enrolled. Median age was 71 (range 52-85). Revised IPSS score was Very Low (10%), Low (71%) or Intermediate (19%). Pts had a median of 1 prior line of therapy post-ESA (range 0-4), including lenalidomide (33%), hypomethylating agents (29%), and luspatercept (19%). SF3B1 mutations were identified in 71% of pts. Median treatment duration was 3.1 months (range 0.03-6.37). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. While the 2 mg intermittent starting dose was tolerable, lower dose schedules of 1 mg intermittent and 0.5 mg continuous (once daily [QD]) dosing were evaluated to reduce myelosuppression, and enrollment was expanded at 0.5 mg QD (n=13 pts). Fifteen pts (71%) experienced ≥1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) that was considered related to the study agent (TRAE). TRAE in >10% of pts were thrombocytopenia (52%), neutropenia (48%), anemia (19%), and dysgeusia (14%). Grade 3 or higher TRAE were reported for 57% of pts. Grade 3 or higher TRAE worsening from baseline in >1 pt were neutropenia (29%); anemia and thrombocytopenia (19.0% each); and diarrhea (9%). TEAEs contributed to treatment interruption, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation in 57%, 14%, and 19% of pts, respectively. Anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the only TRAE leading to treatment modification in >1 pt. Hematologic toxicities were dose-dependent and reversible. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed, respectively, in 67% and 50% of pts at 2 mg intermittent versus 0% and 31% at 0.5 mg QD. Serious AE considered possibly related to JNJ-64619178 by the investigator included 1 pt with Grade 3 anemia and 1 pt with Grade 1 atrial fibrillation, Grade 3 cardiac troponin I increase, and Grade 5 cardiac failure (>30 days from last dose). One other death of unknown cause was not considered related to treatment. Comparison of the multiple dose C trough across all dose levels suggests a dose-dependent increase in JNJ-64619178 plasma concentration. Robust target engagement, as measured by plasma symmetric dimethylarginine, was achieved at all dose levels. Serial analysis of variant allele frequency of clonal mutations in a subset of pts did not show significant reductions from baseline in peripheral blood or bone marrow. No pts experienced objective response or hematologic improvement according to International Working Group criteria, RBC transfusion independence, or meaningful reduction in transfusion requirements. Conclusion JNJ-64619178 demonstrated primarily hematologic toxicity in pts with transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS, which was manageable at the selected expansion dose. Despite robust target engagement, clinical activity was not observed, and enrollment was stopped. The role of PRMT5 in MDS and the differential impact of PRMT5 inhibition on normal and malignant hematopoiesis require further study. Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria. Avivi: Kite, a Gilead Company: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Brunner: Agios: Consultancy; Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aprea: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Morillo: Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Patel: Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Effector Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Evelo Biosciences: Research Funding; Jacobio: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jounce Therapeutics: Research Funding; Klus Pharma: Research Funding; Kymab: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; LSK Biopartners: Research Funding; Lycera: Research Funding; Mabspace: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; ModernaTX: Research Funding; ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Phoenix Molecular Designs: Research Funding; Placon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Research Funding; Revolution Medicines: Research Funding; Ribon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Synthorx: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Tesaro: Research Funding; TopAlliance: Research Funding; Vedanta: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Vigeo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Other: Study investigator; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Cyteir Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ciclomed: Research Funding; Checkpoint Therapeutics: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Bicycle Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Artios Pharma: Research Funding; Agenus: Research Funding; Florida Cancer Specialists: Research Funding; BioNTech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; Hutchinson MediPharma: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Hengrui: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Germing: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Lavie: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Fees for lectures; Roche: Other: Fees for lectures; Novartis: Other: Fees for lectures; Takeda: Consultancy. Lauring: Janssen Research and Development: Current Employment; Johnson and Johnson: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Mistry: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,145
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,653

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCancer-related gene regulationTravaux en français237 207