MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214605197 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-147595

Safety and Efficacy of Early-Start Deferiprone in Infants and Young Children with Beta-Thalassemia (START study)

2021· article· en· W3214605197 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohsen Saleh Elalfy, Amal El‐Beshlawy, Amira Adly, Fatma Soliman Elsayed Ebeid, Caroline Fradette, David Lee, Noemi Toiber Temin, Fernando Tricta, Anna Rozova, Mona Hamdy

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDeferiproneMedicineChelation therapyDeferoxamineThalassemiaRegimenBeta thalassemiaDeferasiroxPediatricsBlood transfusionInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Patients with beta-thalassemia may need to start receiving regular red blood cell transfusions as early as infancy. In the absence of iron chelation therapy, frequent transfusions cause iron to accumulate in the body, which can lead to morbidity, organ damage, and death. However, in very young children, current practice is to delay chelation therapy until receipt of 10-20 transfusions, or until the patient's serum ferritin (SF) level has reached 1000 μg/L, due to concerns over excessive iron depletion observed with the parenteral iron chelator deferoxamine. Unfortunately, this delay may increase the risk of iron accumulation in endocrine glands such as the pancreas, pituitary, and thyroid, where toxicities could manifest later in life. The START study (NCT03591575) evaluated the safety and efficacy of the oral iron chelator deferiprone (DFP) in children with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia who did not yet meet the criteria for starting chelation therapy as per standard practice. Methods: Infants and children who had started on a regular blood transfusion regimen, received a minimum of 2 transfusions, and whose SF level was between 200 and 600 μg/L were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either (DFP) oral solution or a matching volume of placebo until their SF levels exceeded 1000 μg/L at 2 consecutive visits or they completed 12 months of therapy, whichever occurred first. The dosage of DFP was initiated at 25 mg/kg/day and increased to 50 mg/kg/day after 2 weeks; based on iron load, the dosage was then increased to 75 mg/kg/day for some patients. All adverse events (AEs) were reported and assessed for causality. Efficacy was assessed by monthly SF measurements to monitor iron load, with the primary efficacy endpoint being the percentage of patients in each group whose SF was still below the 1000 μg/L threshold. Once withdrawn, the patients were to receive standard chelation therapy, as recommended by their primary care physician. Results: The study enrolled 64 patients; 32 in each group. The mean (SD) age was 3.03 (2.42) years in the DFP group and 2.63 (1.70) years in the placebo group; the participants were 62.5% and 65.6% male in the DFP and placebo groups, respectively. There were no statistical group differences in the baseline demographics. The primary reason for withdrawal was SF levels that exceeded 1000 μg/L at 2 consecutive visits, which occurred in 25% of patients receiving DFP compared with 63% of patients receiving placebo (P=0.0051). After completing 12 months of treatment, 65.6% of patients receiving DFP had a SF level <1000 mg/L compared with 37.5% receiving placebo (P=0.0446). The percentage of patients who reached the 1000 mg/L SF threshold increased more rapidly in the placebo group compared with the DFP group, and the difference in rates between the 2 groups was significant (P=0.0407). A summary of adverse events (AEs) is shown in Table 1. There were no significant group differences in the number of overall AEs (P=1.0000), serious AEs (P=0.4258), or the number of AEs that were considered to be at least possibly related to the study treatment (P=1.0000). Two patients receiving DFP withdrew from the study due to AEs: 1 patient experienced agranulocytosis and 1 patient experienced neutropenia of moderate severity and both patients recovered. Conclusions: Initiation of DFP chelation therapy at a lower threshold of SF values than currently recommended was safe and efficacious in preventing iron overload in most transfusion-dependent children. After 12 months of treatment, the number of patients below the SF threshold was significantly higher in the DFP group compared with the placebo group. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the number of patients who withdrew due to elevated SF levels in the placebo group (62.5%) compared with the DFP group (25%). The safety and tolerability profile of DFP administered for up to 12 months in infants and young children was comparable to the profile established in older age groups and there were no instances of iron depletion. Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Chiesi Global Rare Diseases, and medical writing support was provided by Kelsey Hodge-Hanson, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis Inc., Newtown, PA, and funded by Chiesi. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Fradette: Chiesi Canada Corp: Current Employment. Lee: Chiesi Canada Corp: Current Employment. Temin: Chiesi Canada Corp: Current Employment. Tricta: Chiesi Canada Corp: Current Employment. Rozova: Chiesi Canada Corp: Current Employment. Hamdy: Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; ApoPharma: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207